Laserfiche WebLink
DEL MONTE/DISCO <br /> Page 2 <br /> In accordance with current regulation the responsible parties shall perform a comprehensive documented <br /> receptor survey surrounding the site for the purpose of determining potential human/ecological health <br /> risks and prioritization purposes. This survey shall address exposure pathways including dermal, <br /> inhalation and ingestion routes. Appropriate documentation shall support any claim of no significant <br /> risk. Regarding water supplies, all known wells and surface water locations shall be reported in tabular <br /> and graphical formats. Please include boring logs, screened interval, current status, historical, present <br /> and projected pumping rates with seasonal use patterns when available. <br /> During the next quarterly monitoring event the responsible parties shall at a minimum obtain ground <br /> water sampling data from all wells within a 200 foot radius of MW-DIS-1 to include all piezometers and <br /> MW-DIS-4 and 8S for the purposes of determining current dissolved constituent concentrations. Please <br /> analyze and report results for ground water samples from these wells for BTEX, MTBE, and TPH as <br /> gasoline including standard monitoring well physical data as provided in past reports. All other wells <br /> should be monitored for physical parameters to aid in gradient determination and static water elevation. <br /> PHS/EHD formally requests your compliance with the directive above and requires the submittal <br /> of a work plan to this agency for review no later than April 15, 1997. PHS/EHD is aware that a draft <br /> work plan has been prepared and circulated to the responsible parties and their legal counsel for <br /> comment prior to the issuance of this correspondence. In the event the above listed directives are not <br /> included PHS/EHD will add these scope of work directives to the work plan during the approval process. <br /> The following section of this correspondence is dedicated to comments on the content of the quarterly <br /> monitoring report dated February, 1997. Figure 3 plot plan view shows a "ZONE OF SIGNIFICANT <br /> BTEX CONTAMINATION IN GROUNDWATER'. This depiction is inaccurate and must be modified <br /> considering the absence of lateral and vertical definition at this site particularly in the down gradient <br /> direction. <br /> PHS/EHD does not concur with a majority of the "Summary/Conclusions" presented in the February <br /> 1997 report. Any comments regarding the stability of BTEX and TPH as gasoline concentrations in the <br /> plume or at the fringe at any site where delineation is incomplete is strictly speculative as is the case at <br /> this site. Benzene concentrations have fluctuated from 32,000 ug/1 as of 6/26/91, to 64,000 ug/l as of <br /> 7/20/93, to 65 ug/1 as of 10/18/95, to 8,900 ug/l as of 12/20/96 in MW-DIS-1 alone disqualifying the <br /> reliability of any plume stability references. <br /> The report also states that "Based on the water level gauging and groundwater sampling during August <br /> 1996, the following summary points are provided below:" ... "MTBE was not detected in any of the <br /> monitoring wells sampled." page 17, bullet number 5, under the "Summary/Conclusions" title. This <br /> statement is incorrect and misleading. MTBE has been detected and reported in Table 3 of this report in <br /> samples from MW-DIS-2 at 4.3 ug/1 on 8/15/96 and due to a 1:200 dilution in MW-DIS-1 reported as <br /> <100 ug/l. The actual concentration of MTBE is, therefore, unknown which prompted the directive <br /> regarding future sampling,dilutions, and quantification refinement above. Please correct this error. <br />