My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FILBERT
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545039
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 11:15:59 AM
Creation date
12/10/2019 10:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1
RECORD_ID
PR0545039
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010186
FACILITY_NAME
DEL MONTE FOODS PLNT #33 - DISCO WH
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FILBERT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15702009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 N FILBERT ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Del Monte/Disco <br /> Page 2 <br /> PHS/EHD does not agree that the levels of Fe 1 are elevated in the zone of f <br /> significant contamination. The level of Fetes- decreased in MW-DIS-2, MW-DIS-3, <br /> MW-DIS-'SS, as well as MW-DIS-4 (discussed in the report) . <br /> I I <br /> PHS/EHD does not agree that levels of methane are elevated in the zone of <br /> significant contamination. Levels of methane increased in MW-DIS-2 (which is <br /> in the zone of significant contamination) as well as MW-DIS-8S (which is <br /> outside the zone of significant contamination. <br /> Based on these two sampling events for the ITB geochemical indicators PHS/EHD <br /> does not feel any conclusions can be drawn. The petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination has continued to exist at this site for at least 20 years, based <br /> on the information that the tanks were last used in 1976. As discussed <br /> previously in letters and meetings, the variation of depth to water (50 to 100 <br /> feet below rade) , contaminated aminated soil existing above and below groundwater, and <br /> site difficult to evaluate <br /> and <br /> e <br /> sandy, clayey silt type soil makes this <br /> remediate. <br /> It has been demonstrated that vapor extraction is a viable alternative for <br /> remediation at this site. If the radius of influence of a properly screened <br /> and constructed vapor extraction well can be determined, then the number of <br /> vapor extraction wellsjnecessary* to remediate the contamination at this site <br /> can be determined. The cost of the installation of the vapor extraction wells <br /> and conducting vapor extraction until cleanup goals are achieved, must be <br /> evaluated in comparison to some other remedial alternative as discussed in CCR <br /> Section 2725 (d) . A copy is enclosed. The most cost effective alternative <br /> must be performed. <br /> As discussed above it may be necessary to install properly screened wells and <br /> perform vapor extraction tests, if groundwater levels do not decrease. <br /> If you have any questions contact me at (209) 468-3449. <br /> Donna Heran, RENS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Margaret Lagorio, REHS; Supervisor <br /> Site Mitigation Unit <br /> "c: CH2M Hill <br /> c: CVRWQCB - Beth Thayer <br /> c: SWRCB Cleanup Fund <br /> Enc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.