Laserfiche WebLink
k'q KLEINFELDFR <br /> i <br /> 4 ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED <br /> Kleinfelder conducted the groundwater sampling for the Second Quarter 2005 <br /> } groundwater monitoring. Kleinfelder measured water levels in all of the monitoring <br /> wells and piezometers, and sampled eight monitoring wells (MW-DIS-9, MW-DIS-11s, <br /> MW-DIS-11d, MW-DIS- 12, MW-DIS-13, MW-DIS-14s, MW-DIS-14d, and MW-DIS-15). <br /> All of the wells and piezometers were previously surveyed by Kjeldson, Sinnock, <br /> Neudeck, Inc. (KSN, Inc.) of Stockton, California on February 14, 2002 so groundwater <br /> gradients could be calculated. Measurements obtained from the wells were used to <br /> i evaluate groundwater gradient, groundwater impacts and the need for additional <br /> assessment. Photo-ionization detector (PID) samples were collected from vapor <br /> extraction wells (VE-1, VE-2, VE-3, VE-4, VE-5, and mainline). Air inlet and outlet <br /> samples were also collected on the thermo/catalytic oxidizer. <br /> 4.1 MEASUREMENT OF WATER LEVELS <br /> To assess the groundwater gradient at the time of sampling, water level measurements <br /> were made in each of the 20 monitoring wells and three piezometers at the beginning of <br /> the sampling round, prior to purging and sampling of the wells. The depth-to-water was <br /> measured in each well according to the protocol described in Appendix A, Section A- <br /> 4.1. The depth-to-water measurements were then converted to relative groundwater <br /> elevations with respect to a surveyed benchmark by subtracting them from the <br /> surveyed casing elevations. June 20, 2005 depth to water measurements are included <br /> in the Record of Water Level Measurements in Appendix S. The Monitoring Well <br /> Construction Detail can be found in Table 1. <br /> The resulting pertinent groundwater elevations were used to assess the direction of the <br /> groundwater gradient at the time of sampling. This information was then used to <br /> assess which wells represent upgradient and downgradient groundwater conditions. <br /> See Table 2 for the groundwater elevation data. <br /> Plates 2 shows the location of the groundwater monitoring wells. The depth to <br /> I groundwater ranged from 43.40 feet below the top of the well casing (MW-DIS-11s) to <br /> 52.64 feet below the top of the well casing (MW-DIS-15). Groundwater elevations for <br /> the monitoring wells ranged from -32.09 feet MSL (MW-DIS-5 and MW-DIS-6) to -33.16 <br /> feet MSL (MW-DIS-13). A groundwater gradient direction was estimated based on <br /> depth-to-water data collected from the wells. The groundwater gradient was <br /> i relatively flat on June 20, 2005 towards the southeast ranging from 0.0006 ft./ft. <br /> ? between MW-DIS-6, MW-DIS-10, and MW-DIS-4 to 0.0008 ft./ft between MW-DIS-10, <br /> MW-DIS-12, and MW-DIS-13. A groundwater elevation contour map is included as <br /> Plate 3. In areas of relatively flat groundwater gradients such as this site, groundwater <br /> . gradients may significantly fluctuate due to rainfall, groundwater recharge, groundwater <br /> pumping, etc. Therefore, changes in groundwater may vary at this site with time, <br /> �- however, past data have consistently has suggested a similar groundwater gradient <br /> 12280.M0N/ST05R803/JZ:IV Page 7 of 15 <br /> ©2005, Kleinfelder, Inc. July 25,2005 <br /> i <br />