Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC �EALTH SERVICES rh <br /> s. c <br /> SAN JOAQLJIl'+1 COUNTY :c <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION � e <br /> Ernest X Fujimoto,M,D.,.M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 3,14 E.Nebear Ave.,ThirdF'lcxrr • P.C . Box 388 • Stockton, 952t6o <br /> `* <br /> 231468-3420 <br /> BOB MURDOCH MAILED MAR 2 1 `1996 <br /> .. .. ... .. .... ... .... . ................ <br /> CITY:60:;SfO TON. <br /> 425 N:EL DORADO.AVE <br /> STt� KTON:DA <g520 <br /> Fla. lire Station.00 Site Dols: 11.00 <br /> 1.1 I.S.Alt t Street: <br /> Pursuant to the:January 3Q, 19$5 meeting with City of Stockton representatives, PHSJEHD <br /> has placed the site into the.Local Oversight Program and has provided you minimum <br /> regulatory directives. It is hoped that the City of Stockton has already submitted a Clean- <br /> up;Fund application as suggested In 1994. <br /> The site previously operated two underground storage tanks: 39-1.10,3-tJ1 {5,00 1gallon <br /> diesel) and #39-1100-02(550 gallon gasoline) which have been removed A closure letter <br /> was issued for tank#39-1100-01 on June 1 O, 1994. <br /> Tank#39-1100-02 Removal <br /> On;June 28, 1989,the 550 gallon regular gasoline tank #39-1100-02 was removed and a <br /> sail sampWwas collected. _ <br /> Sample ID Depth TPH- Benzene Toluene Ethyl- Xylene Tetra-Ethyl EDB <br /> gasbenzene Lead <br /> P-81937 8 feet 1,M—pp-m4mgrgl <br /> <Z 3.7' 4.1 110.0 �C 1.d <.010 <br /> ote: camp a resu in <br /> There:_was approximately 5:feet of piping whicK was located above the tank. Both the <br /> tank and the piping was noted to be in poor condition by the PHS/EHD inspector on site at. <br /> the time of removal.. No tank disposal records were received, nor was there an indication <br /> of the disposition of any stockpiled soil. <br /> Site Surrirry: <br /> Seasonal high depWto groundwater(Spring 1988)was 40 feet and based on tl e <br /> rbo <br /> petroleum hydrocan concentrations evidenced at the time of the removal of tank #39 <br /> 11;0.0-O2,sdditlonal investigation is warranted. <br /> I &EHO suggests that 3.4.soil borings be advanced to determine the vertical And <br /> horizontal ext ent of the soil contamination using.either conventional drilling equipment or <br /> push-polot technology: Should the soil contamination extend to groundwater,two;cost <br /> effective options exist&pendln on the drilling methodology which was selected and the <br /> magnitude of soil contamination observed: either install groundwater monitoring wells or <br /> . <br /> collect groun=dwater grab samples.. <br /> A:Division of San Joaquin County i-fealth Care Services <br />