Laserfiche WebLink
Recommendations <br /> Action <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Approve the Negative Declaration; and <br /> 2. Approve Revisions of Approved Actions for Site Approval Application No. SA-94-38 to March <br /> 10, 1997. <br /> Findings <br /> 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, standards, and maps of the General Plan, <br /> any applicable Master Plan, Specific Plan, and Special Purpose Plan, and any other applicable <br /> plan adopted by the County. <br /> • The proposed Revisions do not change that this Finding can be made because the <br /> uses proposed in Site Approval Application No. SA-94-38, 'Religious Assembly' and <br /> 'Retail Sales and Service, Intermediate,'are consistent with the General Commercial <br /> designation of the General Plan and, In turn, are permitted in the C-G zone. <br /> 2. Adequate utilities,roadway improvements,sanitation,water supply,drainage,and other necessary <br /> facilities have been provided, and the proposed improvements are properly related to existing and <br /> proposed roadways. <br /> • The proposed Revisions do not change that this Finding can be made because <br /> adequate utilities, roadway improvements, sanitation, water supply, drainage, and <br /> other necessary facilities are existing, and the proposed uses are properly related to <br /> those improvements to allow their continued use. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and for the intensity of development. <br /> • The proposed Revisions do not change that this Finding can be made because the <br /> property is large enough to accommodate code requirements and applicable <br /> provisions of the Development Title. <br /> 4. Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, <br /> or be injurious to the property or improvements of adjacent properties. <br /> • The proposed Revisions do not change that this Finding can be made because the <br /> Initial Study prepared for the project found no potentially significant, adverse <br /> environmental impacts. <br /> San Joaquin County SA-94-38/Fetzer <br /> Community Development Page 8 <br />