Laserfiche WebLink
City of Stockton <br /> July 18, 1997 A68108.01B <br /> Page 3 <br /> In a request for bid letter (RFB) dated February 8, 1996, the City of Stockton (City) <br /> requested a work plan for the project site to include four soil borings advanced by the direct <br /> push technique (soil probe) to depths of 30 feet BSG. In a letter dated March 21, 1996 the <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services (SJCPHS) suggested that soil borings be <br /> advanced to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of soil contamination. In addition, <br /> if soil contamination appears to extend to groundwater, the SJCPHS suggested that a <br /> groundwater sample be collected. The following sections outline the work performed to <br /> satisfy the request of the City and the suggestions of the SJCPHS. <br /> 4.0 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES <br /> This soil and groundwater assessment consisted of: preparation of a work plan and <br /> appropriate permit applications, a field investigation, a laboratory testing program, and <br /> preparation of a summary report. Standard operating procedures (SOPS), relevant to the <br /> field and laboratory activities, are described in Appendix A. Any specific deviations from <br /> the SOPs are stated in the following sections. <br /> 4.1 Work Plan and Permit Application Approval: The work scope herein described was s <br /> �— presented in Twinings work plan (A68106.03A) dated May 29, 1996 (Twining, 1996). The <br /> �. work plan was approved by the SJCPHS in their letter dated October 22 1996. An <br /> "Application for Well/Pump Permit" for the proposed test borings was submitted to the <br /> SJCPHS on August 14, 1996 and approved on November 1 1996. Copies of the e SJCPHS <br /> work plan approval letter and the approved permit application are attached in Appendix B. <br /> r <br /> 4.2 Field Investigation: The field investigation consisted of collecting sub-surface soil <br /> and groundwater samples for chemical analysis. <br /> 4.2.1 Soil Sampling Technique and Locations: Subsurface soil samples were collected <br /> using a hydraulically-powered, soil probing machine that uses static force and percussion to <br /> advance small diameter sampling tools into subsurface soil for collecting soil cores. A ` <br /> sampling tool (bore sampler)was attached to the leading end of a probe rod and driven into <br /> the subsurface using the machine. The sampling tool collected a continuous soil sample as <br /> it was advanced. The sampler advanced approximately 48 inches and then was recovered <br /> from the bore hole. The bore sample (soil sample) was extracted from the sampler. The <br /> soil sample was contained within a 2-inch diameter sampler liner of clear plastic. <br /> The soil samples were examined for the purpose of preparing lithologic logs. Soil <br /> descriptions were documented on a field boring log consistent with the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System (USCS). The soil samples were field screened for evidence of volatile <br /> organic compounds (VOCs) and/or other contaminates. The field screening consisted of; <br /> visual observation for straining or free fluids, unusual odor, and head space analysis using <br />