Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Robert Trommer Page 7 of 7 <br /> Comments on CUF Site Closure Recommendations for Various Sites March 3, 2010 <br /> Claim No. 17042 - 15406 S. Tracy Blvd, Tracy <br /> This site has persistent moderate TPHg , and low ethylbenzene and xylenes contaminants in <br /> one well , MW-4. Wells toward the north, east and south are not impacted; there are no <br /> delineating wells toward the west. A domestic well is located approximately 135 feet southwest <br /> of MW4. In November 2009 limited groundwater extraction (GWE) was implemented utilizing <br /> MW-4. Approximately 15, 000 gallons were extracted from the well . Since then the well has <br /> been monitored monthly; concentrations were reduced, but may be rebounding - The consultant <br /> plans to complete the rebound testing with the March sampling event and then prepare a report <br /> of findings. The plume appears to be of limited extent, except toward the west, which is not <br /> characterized. Significantly impacted soil has not been encountered on the site There does not <br /> appear to be a significant contaminant mass present, but the contaminants are persistent and <br /> there is a domestic well to protect. The EHD will issue a directive to prepare a site closure <br /> summary report, addressing plume delineation and evaluation of vapor intrusion and health risk <br /> issues, threat to the domestic well, and other site closure concerns. If a favorable report is <br /> received, the EHD anticipates site closure in nine to twelve months- <br /> Claim No. 17179 - 15 E. Grant Line Road, Tracy <br /> Dissolved contaminant concentrations have declined to levels suitable for site closure <br /> consideration The consultant has recently obtained grab groundwater samples to complete the <br /> lateral and vertical delineation of the site, and the results are pending . The EHD will direct <br /> completion of a vapor intrusion evaluation . Upon receipt of the results of the recent grab <br /> groundwater investigation and the vapor intrusion evaluation, the EHD will initiate the site <br /> closure process if warranted by the additional information. The EHD anticipates site closure may <br /> be obtained in six to twelve months. <br /> Summary <br /> The EHD will be moving these sites to closure as rapidly as possible. The EHD has responded <br /> previously to the CUF on these sites in response to the five-year reviews and the annual <br /> updates. Direct comments from the CUF technical staff on the concerns expressed on the more <br /> problematic sites above are requested (specifically Claim Nos. 8431 , 7709, 11775, 141180 <br /> 14349, 14353, 15211 , 15890, and 17042) - An EHD representative is available to meet with <br /> your technical staff if that would be helpful <br /> If you need more information to complete your evaluation of these cases, please contact Nuel <br /> Henderson, Engineering Geologist, at (209) 468-3436, or nhendersonna.sicehd . com . <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nuel C. Henderson, Jr. , PG Adrienne Ellsaesser, REHS <br /> Engineering Geologist Acting Program Coordinator <br /> i <br /> Comments on CUF Site Closure Recommendations 0310.doc <br />