Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> i PQUIN - . <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Unit Supervisors <br /> Donna K. Heran, R.E.H.S. 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor Carl Borgman, R.E xs. <br /> Director Mike Huggins, R E H.S., R.D.I. <br /> m. Al Olsen, R.E.H.s, Stockton, California 95202-2708 Douglas W. Wilson, R.E.H.S. <br /> ProgramManager er g Telephone: (209) 468-3420 Margaret Lagorio, R.E.H.s. <br /> gCiFO R� <br /> Laurie A. Cotulla,R.E.H.S, 138 Robert McClellon, R.E.H.S. <br /> Program Manager Fax: (209) 4 �-0eMark Barcellos, R.E.H.S. <br /> GUARDING AND CRAWFORD IECEI g64�TEi JUN 2 12004 <br /> 517 W FREMONT ST. m <br /> STOCKTON CA 95201 JUN 17 2 !404 <br /> RE: GUARDINO AND CRAWFORD SITE CODE: 1112 <br /> 517 W Fremont St. <br /> Stockton CA 95201 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has not received any <br /> quarterly sampling report since Quarterly Report - ThirdQuarter 2003 dated October 20, 2003 <br /> prepared by your consultant, Advanced GeoEnvironmeraml, Inc. (AGE) . In a telephone <br /> conversation on June 15, 2004, AGE stated the quarterly reports for 41hquarter 2003 and 1'r <br /> quarter 2004 are not complete. The laboratory analytical results corresponding to these <br /> outstanding reports have also not been submitted electronically to GeoTracke. the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board database program. <br /> As a responsible party, you are required to submit quarterly sampling reports to EHD on a <br /> timely basis. You should endeavor to submit a quarterly sampling report within 45 days after <br /> sampling. EHD directs the two above-mentioned outstanding quarterly reports be <br /> submitted to EHD by July 1, 2004. You are also directed to initiate electronical submission <br /> of laboratory analytical results to GeoTracker. <br /> The above-mentioned Quarter Report — Third Quarter2003 reported a rise in concentrations of <br /> all four aromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in monitoring <br /> well 1ViW-1 compared to the two previous quarters in 2003, but remained relatively <br /> consistent compared to the previous 4 years of sampling. Analytical results of benzene were <br /> 4,400 micrograms per liter (ug/1) and of MTBE were 63 ug/L Concentrations of <br /> contaminants in MW-2 have continued to drop, with analytical results of 4. 1 ug/1 benzene, <br /> and non-detect for MTBE. Analytical results of groundwater samples from the four <br /> remaining wells MW-3 to IVIW-6 were non-detect for all contaminants tested. Groundwater <br /> flow direction has been consistently calculated as northwest. AGE concluded the <br /> contamination plume to be confined to the general area around MW-1 and MW-2, and <br /> recommended preparation of a corrective action plan. <br /> The vertical extent of the contamination plume has not been defined. EHD does not agree <br /> that a correction action plan is appropriate at this time. The deepest groundwater samples <br /> were the grab groundwater samples obtained from boring P9 at 35 feet below. surface grade <br /> (bsg) , and P10 at 40 feet bsg in November 2000. Analytical results of the P9 sample were <br /> 35,000 ug/1 of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), 380 ug/1 of benzene, <br />'i <br /> and 21 ug/1 of MTBE, and results of the P10 grab water sample were 760 ug/1 of TPH-g, <br /> i <br />'r <br />