My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
517
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541344
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 12:30:38 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 11:05:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0541344
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023692
FACILITY_NAME
GUARDINO & CRAWFORD
STREET_NUMBER
517
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13721410
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
517 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> N � <br /> 22 November 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No . 95-0167 <br /> IJ Page 11 of 15 <br /> 6. 1 .3 , MONITORING ACTIVITIES <br /> One of the potential problems associated with air sparging is lateral spreading of the contaminant <br /> plume. This can be caused by either mounding of ground water above injection points or lateral air <br /> flow away from sparging wells. To detect this problem, ground water elevations in monitoring wells <br /> and extraction wells (if appropriate) should be monitored on a monthly basis, at the minimum, to <br /> detect mounding and the presence of organic vapor. <br /> 6 . 1 .4. FEASIBILITY <br /> In-situ air sparging of dissolved hydrocarbons in ground water at the site may have high feasibility. <br /> lRemediation of ground water at the site would require only a moderate number of injection and <br /> -J extraction points and utilization of a small area for an underground injection/extraction piping <br /> network. Air injection and extraction rates must be balanced to prevent the forced migration of <br /> I contaminants. An IAS pilot test has not been performed at the site; however, data from soil samples <br /> - collected at the site indicate that soil in the saturated zone between 15 feet and 30 feet bsg consists <br /> of a moderate amount of sand and silty sand, which typically possess hydraulic conductivity values <br /> that are favorable for air sparging (Figure 3) . <br /> h One concern with IAS remediation is precipitation of iron and/or manganese, which can cause <br /> clogging of sparge points. <br /> j � 6. 1 . 5. DURATION <br /> J Air sparging in highly permeable aquifers generally results in rapid reduction of hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in the saturated zone. Remediation times are generally comparable with soil vapor <br /> extraction times. At the site, we estimate a remediation period of 12 to 24 months for shorter-chain <br /> ( l hydrocarbons . <br /> IJ <br /> ( I 6. 1 .6. COST <br /> l J Installation of an in-situ air sparging system will require the installation of several sparging and <br /> extraction wells, piping system and equipment. Setup costs would likely range from $20,000.00 to <br /> 4- $40,000 .00 . Sparging equipment maintenance and monitoring would range from $5 ,000.00 to <br /> $ 10,000 .00 annually. <br /> If air sparging is chosen for ground water remediation, vapor extraction will be used for vadose zone <br /> J Advanced GeoEnviron ental, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.