Laserfiche WebLink
I� <br /> T <br /> II� <br /> 22 September 1997 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 95-0167 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />' Joaquin County Flood Control District and Water Conservation District, and information obtained <br /> from the PHS-EHD from monitoring wells at surrounding sites Furthermore, PHS-EHD records <br /> indicate that the highest observed ground water elevation at the property was 10 feet bsg, measured <br />' in 1986 During the initial site assessment conducted in September 1995, ground water was <br /> measured at approximately 25 feet bsg While during the site assessment in April 1997,ground water <br /> was measured at approximately 15 feet bsg <br /> Thep revailing ground water flow direction in central Stockton is generally toward the northeast, <br /> however, localized ground water flow direction may vary during winter/summer cycles and tidal <br /> fluctuations Ground water is considered to be of beneficial use and is utilized for domestic, <br /> industrial and commercial purposes <br /> I' <br /> 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> 3 1 PROBING AND SAMPLING <br /> A total of eight soil probe borings (P1 through P8) were advanced at the site, under the observation <br /> of a representative of the PHS-EHD On 19 September 1995, probe boring P 1 was advanced north <br /> of the former UST area, probe boring P2 was advanced near the center of the former UST <br /> ' excavation, and probe boring P3 was advanced near the former dispenser location Each of these <br /> boring were advanced to a depth of 25 feet bsg <br /> ' On 21 April 1997, P4 was advanced in the City of Stockton right-of-way in Fremont Street Four <br /> additional soil probe borings were advanced on the site, in the vicinity the former UST, including <br /> ' probe boring P7, which was advanced under the building on the site Each of these probing were <br /> advanced to a vertical depth of 15 feet bsg Locations of the soil probe borings are illustrated on <br /> Figure 2 <br /> ' Soil samples were collected from each boring at five-foot intervals, beginning at various depths <br /> using a Geoprobe soil sampling assembly and four brass sleeves Samples were collected using a <br /> ' 2 15-inch diameter,two-foot long, piston-type sampler loaded with four pre-cleaned 1 375-inch by <br /> 6-inch brass sleeves The sampling equipment was washed in an Alconox solution and rinsed with <br /> water prior to each sampling run to prevent cross-contamination After collection, the ends of the <br /> ' second brass sleeve were covered with Teflon sheets, capped and sealed with tape Samples were _ <br /> placed in a chilled container under ice and transported to McCampbell Analytical,Inc , (MAI)under <br /> ' chain-of-custody <br /> • Two soil samples were transported to an independent microbiologist, Mr A Keith Kaufmann of <br /> Culver City, California, and analyzed for physicochemical properties and microbiological <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />