My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
800
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0504481
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 11:36:03 AM
Creation date
12/17/2019 11:22:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0504481
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0006215
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY MOTORS C/O CITY OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
800
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
04
SITE_LOCATION
800 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12/29/2006 17: 08 120994x" 18 PAGE 03 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUI <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br /> 10 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN No, MS 40167 <br /> it <br /> DECISION <br /> 12 V. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 VALLEY MOTORS <br /> 15 -- <br /> 16 This matter came on for hearing on May 22, 2001 in Department No.M2 of the <br /> 17 above entitled court, the honorable F. Clark Sueyres, Judge presiding. Doug Wilson an( <br /> 1g Karen Jung appeared for Plaintiff, and Tom O'Neill appeared for Defendant. Evidencf:. <br /> 19 and argument was presented by both parties, and the court now finds, adjudges an,. <br /> 20 decrees: <br /> 21 <br /> 22 In this action the County seeks various permit fees for the maintenance of c <br /> 23 underground storage tank in the sidewalk area adjacent to defendant's property. <br /> 24 <br /> ispute that the tank existed buried under a sidewalk with a capp� <br /> 25 There is no d <br /> 26 opening on the sidewalk, that it is adjacent only to defendant's property, that there we <br /> 27 no permits ever issued for its maintenance and that the sidewalk is owned in fee by t <br /> 29 City of Stockton, not by easement, which is quite uncommon. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.