Laserfiche WebLink
Vertical and Horizontal Delineation of Plume History <br /> Monitoring Wells MW#1, MW#2, and MW#3 were installed in September of 1999 to a depth of sixty <br /> feet Soil samples from the soil bores were extracted at five foot intervals from a depth of ten feet to sixty <br /> feet (see site map for location attached) All three soil bores produced samples above detection levels <br /> for BTEX and TPHg and TPHd (see Soil Sample Recap Attached) <br /> Monitoring Wells MW#4S and MW#4D were installed on the east side of Wilson Way in September of <br /> 2000 Also,monitoring wells MW#5D,MW#6S and MW#6D,MW#7S and MW#7D were installed north <br /> and south of the pump islands in September of 2000 (see attached Site Map) <br /> Monitoring wells MW#8S and MW#$D were installed in a single bore hole inside the existing building, <br /> west of the pump islands on October 3,2000 Monitoring wells MW#9S and MW#9D were constructed <br /> in a single soil bore on August 14, 2002 <br /> A work plan for five CPT's and two monitoring wells was approved by you on December 12, 2002 A <br /> cost estimate for the work plan was prepared by this office and a preapproval request for funding by the <br /> UST Cleanup Fund was submitted Approval from the UST Fund was granted on February of 2003 <br /> INSTALLATION OF CPT'S AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT <br /> Procedure <br /> The installation of CPT's,by Gregg In Situ Inc , began on March 14 with the installation of CPT#1 All <br /> cone penetrations were made to a depth of 140'below the surface of the concrete slab Soil samples were <br /> extracted using a 1" push sampler and water samples were extracted using a standard hydro punch with <br /> a 4' screen with 112" baler <br /> Soil samples were contained in a 1" stainless steel sample tube that was capped with Teflon sheet and <br /> a plastic cap secured by duct tap Samples were placed on ice for storage and transport Water samples <br /> were placed directly from the baler to 40 ml Voeas that were sealed with plastic caps and placed on ice <br /> for transport All samples were transported under chain of custody to BSK Laboratories for analysis by <br /> EPA Methods 8260, 8015(M) and 8020 BSK subcontracted out a portion of the analysis to Castle <br /> Analytical Laboratory (see chain of custody attached) <br /> Findings from Sample Analysis <br /> CPT#1 that is located south of Monitoring well MW#7S&MW97D was analyzed as non-detect for all <br /> soil and water samples for all analytes Water samples from CPT#2,CPT#3,CPT#4,and CPT#5 all had <br /> varying concentrations of 1,2-DCA from a low of 14 ug/L to a high of 420 ug/L Concentrations of THPg <br /> in water samples ranged from a low of non-detect to a high of 42000 ug/L in CPT#5 at 61 feet of depth <br /> The only soil samples with the presence of1,2-DCA were extracted from CPT#5 in concentrations from <br /> 14 ug/Kg to 28 ug/Kg <br /> Findings from Cone Penetration Data <br /> The Cone Penetration data failed to define any consistent lithology across the site A sizable sand <br /> permeable strata exists between depths of 15 and 25 feet All other permeable strata are very weakly <br /> defined and lack continuity across the site A very poorly defined sandy silt strata was found between 80' <br /> to 85',and 105'to 115' feet of depth In general,visual classification of extracted soil samples confirmed <br /> 2 <br />