My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007305
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
2211
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545106
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2019 4:19:13 PM
Creation date
12/19/2019 4:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007305
RECORD_ID
PR0545106
PE
3529
FACILITY_ID
FA0003694
FACILITY_NAME
RIVER CITY PETROLEUM CARDLOCK
STREET_NUMBER
2211
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
11707050
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2211 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
split spoon sampler on five foot intervals,starting at a depth of ten feet and proceeding to a depth of sixty <br /> feet Each sample was logged and classified by the unified soil classification system Selected samples <br /> were capped,sealed,and placed on ice for delivery under chain of custody to Sherwood Labs Spoil from <br /> the boring operation was collected in 55 gallon drums for disposal at a certified disposal site <br /> MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> Three two-inch PVC monitoring well casings were installed at a depth of 60 feet as per the attached <br /> drawing The installation of the monitoring well under the dispenser canopy was very time consuming <br /> as vertical clearance did not allow for the drilling ng to extend the drill boom The other two monitoring <br /> wells were constructed using typical methods All monitoring wells were developed and purged by Del- <br /> Tech Geotechnical Support Services using methods standard to the industry Development and purge <br /> water was stored in plastic drums for future disposal <br /> SOIL ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES <br /> All samples from the soil borings were transported under chain of Custody for analysis by EPA methods <br /> for BTEX , TPHg and TPHd One selected sample from each soil bore was forwarded under chain of <br /> custody to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc for analysis by EPA method 8260 A recap of all soil analysis is <br /> attached to and a part of this report <br /> WATER ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FROM MONITORING WELLS <br /> Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Services extracted water samples from each monitoring well by standard <br /> industry practices under the supervision of Foothill Engineering A report of these activities by Del-Tech <br /> Geotechnical Support Services is attached and apart of this report Water samples were transported under <br /> ice by chain of custody to Sherwood Labs for analysis by EPA methods 602, 5030/8015(M) and <br /> 3510/8015(M)for BTEX,TPHg,and TPHd A water sample from each monitoring well was transported <br /> • under chain of custody to Entech Analytical Labs, Inc for analysis by EPA method 8260B <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Soil samples M W#1 @25'&MW#1 @30'were the only samples found to contain TPHd All soil samples <br /> were found to be non-detect for all oxygenates The highest concentration of targeted hydrocarbons is in <br /> the samples extracted from a depth of 55 and 60 feet that are about ten feet below the groundwater <br /> Xylene is the BTEX compound found in the highest concentrations in soil samples <br /> All water samples were analyzed as non-detect for all oxygenates BTEX compounds in the groundwater <br /> were found in the highest concentrations in MW#1 The concentrations of TPHg in monitoring wells <br /> MW#2 and MW#3 were about one half the concentrations ofMW#1 The groundwater gradient is down <br /> slope to the Northeast at S=0 0007 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> It is evident from the soil and water samples that center of the plume and the highest concentrations of <br /> contaminates is closer to MW#1^than the other two monitoring wells The water samples from MW#2 <br /> acid MW#3 contain lower concentrations of Benzene than MW#1 This indicates a natural break down <br /> and dilution of the of BTEX compounds found in MW#1 which is up gradient from MW#2 and MW#3 <br /> (see site map for flow direction) Soil borings for MW#2 and MW#3 show only contamination below <br /> groundwater This may indicate that the spread of contamination is by the groundwater and not by gravity <br /> in the soil matrix <br /> The most likely source of the contamination is in the area of the westerly dispenser island that is nearest <br /> to monitoring well MW#1 The spill could have come from product piping or a dispenser <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.