Laserfiche WebLink
of the ground-water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may <br /> be transported to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> First ground water is predicted at 56 to 59 feet below ground surface for this Site; <br /> consequently, significant nitrate reduction would be anticipated as the septic effluent <br /> percolates downward. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, "average recharge rate of rainfall" was utilized. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS). Recharge is calculated by first <br /> determining whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water <br /> into the aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the <br /> calculation. This approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, <br /> consequently, over-estimates nitrate loading. <br /> For the project Site, the local percolation and evapotranspiration rates are presented in <br /> Plates 14 and 15. The Site is located between the CIMIS Stations at Holt (station 248) <br /> and Staten Island (station 242); taking both stations into account will yield a value more <br /> representative of the area. During the past five-year period, data from the Holt station <br /> were only available for 2017 and 2018; based on the calculation shown, the estimated <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Holt station is determined to be 3.72 <br /> inches (Plate 14). A statistical error of 25 percent is associated with this value. Data for <br /> the Staten Island station were available for the past three years; based on the <br /> calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Staten <br /> Island station is determined to be 12.60 inches (Plate 15). A statistical error of 49 <br /> percent is associated with this value. The two stations are then averaged, for a regional <br /> deep percolation value of 8.16 inches. <br /> LOGE 1939 Page 10 <br />