Laserfiche WebLink
PaU'��Z SAN�JOAQUIN <br /> - J0A0Environmental Health Department <br /> °atP OUNTY <br /> Greatness grows here. <br /> 4.6 Identify the maximum daily volume of wastewater generated from all fixtures at the site, using the <br /> full build out of the project. (phased projects can use phased approach but must include <br /> information for each phase to full potential build out). �A <br /> 5.0 SITE EVALUATION INFORMATION <br /> 5.1 Flooding, thickness/depth of vadose zone, lithology of vadose zone, percolation testing results= <br /> permeability of soils, slope, rock outcrops, site topography'01" <br /> 5.2 Soil profile through borings, excavations s. � <<i''-"" `P I'. <br /> 5.2.1 Site map showing the location, with dimensions, of the soil profile pit on the parcel. <br /> 5.2.2 Description of soil profile pit including depth and dimensions. <br /> 5.2.3 Description of soil lithology, soil texture, structure, color, and saturation —(Page 31-34 <br /> EPA DM) <br /> 5.2.4 Discussion of any potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> alternative septic system. <br /> 5.3 Percolation Testing <br /> 5.3.1 Permit obtained ✓ <br /> 5.3.2 The test conformed to SJC Policy EHD 02-02 (correct depth, diameter, 2" gravel, 6" water <br /> refill, correct readings recorded). (make sure all items on check list are included here) ,/- <br /> 5.3.2.1 Description of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including <br /> depth and dimensions of hole, preparation of hole, and depth of water used to <br /> presoak(minimum 12 inches). <br /> 5.3.2.2 Description of the date,time and condition of the test hole after the 24-hour soak <br /> period (hole still intact, hole dry, depth to water remaining in hole, etc.) <br /> 5.3.2.3 Complete Percolation Test Form (including readings)was provided with REHS <br /> verification signature. The rate was correctly calculated using the last reading. <br /> 5.3.2.4 <br /> 5.3.3 Perc rate compared to estimated hydraulic characteristics table (Page 39 EPA DM). If not <br /> comparable need to determine why. <br /> 5.3.4 Perc rate compared to Table 1.10.1 SJC Standards for minimum depth to water and <br /> standard or engineered system to determine appropriate/adequate wastewater loading <br /> area ✓ <br /> 5.3.5 Site map showing the location, with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation <br /> test holes on the parcel. <br /> 5.3.6 The minimum number of shallow and deep percolation tests was performed for each <br /> parcel. (specify what is required) <br /> 5.3.7 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br /> fields needed at the site. (use what to determine dispersal area?) / <br /> 5.4 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> 5.5 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern identified for the project site. Use EPA DM or WA State <br /> info <br /> 5.6 <br /> 6.0 GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br /> 6.1 Depth to water data for wells within 2 miles of the site <br /> Use Casgem: https://www.casgem.water.ca.gov/oss/(s(srvaO6ssbtgvznmsohafgvlm))/Default.aspx?ReturnUrl=/ass <br /> Use Geotracker: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ <br /> 6.2 Identify current depth to water and date measured. ✓ <br /> 6.3 Identify highest depth to water and date measured. <br /> 6.4 Identify general gradient and direction of groundwater flow, based on actual data, cite source of <br /> data. <br /> EHD 26-02-002 Page 2 of 2 Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />