Laserfiche WebLink
The estimated mass of petroleum hydrocarbons remaining in Zones A and B is substantially the same as <br /> the mass reported in the Estimated Mass Remaining Letter Report(Ash Creek, 2012b). A copy of the report <br /> documenting the original estimate as well as updated estimated masses are provided in Appendix G. <br /> Extent in the C-Zone. Because it is composed of more continuous sand units (see Figures 3 through 5) <br /> than the AIB-zone, concentrations in the C-zone have migrated slightly further. However, concentrations do <br /> not extend more than about 500 feet from the Facility, as shown on Figure 14. The C-zone wells closest to <br /> the Facility were installed in 2009; C-zone analytical results collected since 2009 are contained in Table E-1 <br /> of Appendix E. Review of these results indicates that the petroleum constituents and MTBE concentrations <br /> in the C-zone are not increasing and the extent of the plume is stable. As discussed in Section 2.3, <br /> groundwater velocity in the C-zone is estimated to flow between 130 and 440 feet per year. The stability of <br /> the dissolved-phase hydrocarbon and MTBE concentrations in the presence of relatively high groundwater <br /> velocity indicates that microbial degradation is successfully limiting migration. <br /> It should be noted that concentrations shown in Table 3 and Appendix E represent samples that were not <br /> treated with silica-gel prior to analysis. When C-zone sample extracts are treated with silica-gel prior to <br /> analysis, resulting TPHd concentrations are generally below detection limits(see Table 5). <br /> The estimated mass of petroleum hydrocarbons remaining in the C-zone is substantially the same as the <br /> mass reported in the Estimated Mass Remaining Letter Report(Ash Creek, 2012b). A copy of the report <br /> documenting the original estimate as well as updated estimated masses are provided in Appendix G. <br /> Extent in the D-Zone. As for the C-zone, historical extent maps have not been prepared for the D-zone <br /> because most D-zone wells were installed in 2009 and 2010; however, analytical results from the most <br /> recent monitoring event (August 2012) are shown on Figures 15. Monitoring results for D-zone wells <br /> downgradient of the Facility are tabulated in Table 3 and Appendix E. <br /> The estimated mass of petroleum hydrocarbons remaining in the D-zone is substantially the same as the <br /> mass reported in the Estimated Mass Remaining Letter Report(Ash Creek, 2012b). A copy of the report <br /> documenting the original estimate as well as updated estimated masses are provided in Appendix G. <br /> 4.0 Conceptual Site Model <br /> A conceptual site model (CSM) was developed in the Investigation Summary Report (Ash Creek 2012a) <br /> submitted to the Water Board on January 6, 2012. This section presents the CSM, including the information <br /> used in its support and development. The CSM summarizes the potential receptors and exposure pathways <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the Facility under current or reasonably anticipated future <br /> conditions. The CSM for the Facility considers physical properties,the nature and extent of dissolved-phase <br /> Revised Cleanup Plan Page 13 <br /> ak NuStar Stockton Terminal-Stockton California <br /> November 7,2012 <br /> 1014-12 <br />