My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2941
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518632
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:54:29 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 2:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0518632
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014022
FACILITY_NAME
ST SERVICES
STREET_NUMBER
2941
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2941 NAVY DR
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recirculation/Bioaugmentation. As described in Section 2.6, a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of <br /> a recirculation bioaugmentation system was performed at the site. Because residual hydrocarbons are <br /> contained in the upper silt unit at the site, the pilot study system wells (both extraction and injection wells) <br /> were installed completely within this unit. The pilot study demonstrated that MTBE (and associated <br /> degradation products, such as TBA) are successfully degraded by biological processes. As would be <br /> expected, the most significant degradation was observed in wells that were consistently exposed to the <br /> augmented water flow—changes in groundwater gradient during the pilot study reduced the apparent <br /> effectiveness in wells farther from the injection points. Hydraulic control was difficult to achieve and <br /> maintain in the silt unit, so delivery of sufficient oxygen and nutrients for increased degradation of residual <br /> hydrocarbons in the upper silt(relative to natural processes)was therefore limited. <br /> While the system did result in an impact to the underlying sand unit (with significant petroleum degradation <br /> observed in the deep monitoring well PS-4), the pilot study results suggest that injection and/or extraction <br /> from the lower sand within the A-zone would be needed to effectively address dissolved-phase <br /> concentrations in this layer. Because the bulk of the hydrocarbons are contained in the upper silt unit, it <br /> would not be time efficient to operate the system only within the sandy layer. As stated above, operating the <br /> system within the silt layer would not achieve a significantly decreased remediation time relative to natural <br /> processes. <br /> Anaerobic In-Situ Biological Treatment. Anaerobic bioremediation technologies have been shown in field <br /> and laboratory conditions to successfully degrade MTBE, TPH, and BTEX. However, anaerobic processes <br /> are slower and are more likely to be incomplete for MTBE (which could cause a buildup of TBA <br /> concentrations)depending on specific site conditions. <br /> An anaerobic enhanced bioremediation pilot study was conducted at the adjacent SFPP parcel (LFR, 2005). <br /> Bench scale respirometric tests conducted on samples from the SFPP site confirmed that site microbes <br /> were capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons with the addition of nitrates. A pilot study was <br /> conducted where nitrates were applied to the ground surface and allowed to infiltrate into the subsurface. <br /> The results of the pilot study demonstrated that the nitrates were being utilized to assist in the anaerobic <br /> degradation of hydrocarbons. However, it was ultimately concluded that the technology was infeasible due <br /> to the large amounts of nutrients(e.g., nitrates)that would be required to reduce the petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> mass. The results showed that the nutrient addition did not significantly increase the biodegradation in <br /> shallow groundwater and therefore was not significantly enhancing the natural degradation occurring at the <br /> site. <br /> Bioventing and Biosparging. Bioventing involves the installation of wellpoints into the unsaturated zone <br /> and either injecting air or causing air to circulate through the subsurface. Biosparging involves installing <br /> wellpoints screened below the water table and injecting air. Hart Crowser conducted bioventing and <br /> biosparging pilot studies at the SFPP site in 1994 (Hart Crowser, 1994a and 1994b). The results of the <br /> Revised Cleanup Plan Page 19 <br /> ak NuStar Stockton Terminal-Stockton,California <br /> T_ November Z 2012 <br /> 1014-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.