My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011294
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
1401
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545145
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011294
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2020 11:36:42 AM
Creation date
1/9/2020 11:05:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011294
RECORD_ID
PR0545145
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003820
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY WHOLESALE DRUG
STREET_NUMBER
1401
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13525031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1401 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
gedogicalTechnics W. Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 989.2 <br /> January 15,2003 <br /> ' • Fuel oxygenate suite(MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME, and TBA by EPA method 8260) <br /> • 1,2-Dibroinoethane and 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2 DCA and EDB by EPA method 8260) <br /> Th e <br /> The fuel oxygenates samples, 1,2 DCA and EDB, were submitted by Sherwood Labs to <br /> ' Entech Analytical Labs of Santa Clara, California (DHS # 2346). <br /> The detection limits for these compounds are listed in the laboratory data sheets included in <br /> ' Appendix C and summarized in Table 2 of Appendix A. A Chain of Custody was <br /> completed for all samples collected and tracked to ensure sample integrity. <br /> On December 9, 2002, the laboratory data were submitted electronically to GeoTracker as <br /> required under A132886. The confirmation number for the electronic submittal is <br /> 7213825881. <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> 2.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> On November 19, 2002, the depth to groundwater was measured in all of the wells prior to <br /> purging. Depths to groundwater ranged from a high of 7.72 feet below the top of casing to <br /> a low of 9.22 feet below the top of casing. The average depth to water was 8.71 feet below <br /> the top of casing and the average groundwater elevation at the site is 1.66 feet below mean <br /> sea level. The wells are screened at 5 feet bgs and groundwater surface continues to be <br /> ' below the tops of the screens in the nine shallow monitoring wells. <br /> Site-specific groundwater gradient was calculated using MW-3, MW-7 and MW-9, and <br /> ' found to be N34°W at 0.0039 ft/ft. The calculated groundwater gradient is displayed on the <br /> groundwater gradient map, Figure 3. Previous groundwater gradient calculations show a <br /> consistent bearing of north-northwest. Bearings have been measured between N05°W and <br /> ' N45°W at the site and the slope historically averages 0.0051 ft/ft. Historical groundwater <br /> bearing and slope are summarized in Table 1 of Appendix A and are plotted on a Rose <br /> Diagram, Figure 4. <br /> ' 2.2 Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> ' • Low concentrations of BTEX were present in MW-I and MW-4. <br /> • Trace amounts of Ethyl benzene and Xylene were detected in MW-3. <br /> ' • No constituent of BTEX was found in the remaining monitoring wells. <br /> • Low concentrations of TPH gasoline were detected in MW-1 and MW-4. TPH-G was <br /> not present in any other monitoring wells. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.