Laserfiche WebLink
Wm. J. Hunter & Associates <br /> CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1. The vertical limits of soil& groundwater contamination have been well delineated. <br /> 2. Soil contamination exists beneath the southeast comer of the office& shop building, and <br /> possibly to the north along the driveway on the east side of the building. <br /> 3. The highest levels of groundwater contaminants have been measured in MW-1, which is <br /> located closest to, and downgradient from, the removed UST's. <br /> 4. The water table has fluctuated from an average depth of 6.39'bgl to 9.12'bgl, and has <br /> always been below the tops of the well screens, which are at 5' below grade. <br /> 5. MW-1 has consistently measured the highest levels of contaminants in the groundwater. <br /> 6. MW-1 &MW-2 have never revealed MTBE since sampling began in December, 1995. <br /> 7. The levels of BTEX& TPHg in MW-3 show a decrease with time, suggesting that bio- <br /> remediation is occurring, since there is no evidence that the plume is migrating down- <br /> gradient. <br /> 8. MTBE was detected in MW-3 from the February, 1999 sampling event, but was not <br /> confirmed. It was not detected in the latest sample, indicatinp,that the 2/99 reading was <br /> incorrect. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> Based upon the evidence obtained to date, we continue to believe that additional investi- <br /> gative work is not required, and recommend the installation of ORC material in MW-1 to �~ <br /> reduce contamination to minimum levels. Air-sparging/soil vapor extraction is not feaible <br /> because of the shallow water table, and additional soil cannot be excavated due to the <br /> proximity of the building, an electrical transformer, and a large California Water Service <br /> water Line which traverses the site in the middle of the driveway on the east side of the <br /> building.. We do not believe that additional monitoring is justified without a plan to mitigate <br /> the remaining contamination. We requested a response to this recommendation in the <br /> previous report, but have yet to receive a reply. The owners are anxious to proceed with <br /> whatever additional work is required by the County EHD in order to obtain site closure. We <br /> would a reci to your prompt review and response to this report. <br /> W <br /> W J. n er&Associates ^44e ����� <br /> cc: alley Wholesale Drug Co. <br /> - M k List, RWQCB a V:,,' �. �,s ITER <br /> OF c ,`.00H' <br /> i <br />