My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
2285
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545154
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2020 3:55:50 PM
Creation date
1/9/2020 3:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545154
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0001659
FACILITY_NAME
QUIK STOP MARKET #7039
STREET_NUMBER
2285
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
141-214-03
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2285 E FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Blank Page-1 of 1 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] ; <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 10:42 AM <br /> To: 'rsmith@horizonenvironmental•.net' <br /> Subject: Quik Stop Market#39 ' <br /> Rex, <br /> i <br /> welcome back.... <br /> t <br /> got a chance to review the Geotracker EDFhab for this Stockton' site done on C <br /> June 4, 2009. I'm confused why 1 ,2-dibromoethane was analyzed for? <br /> My May 13, 2009 fetter approved a,frequency reduction and analyte reduction <br /> and stated, 'starting.Fourth quarter2009'. <br /> it appears you started 'Second quarter 2009 and modified my requirement for <br /> ONLY TPHg and DCA to include EDB? - <br /> why? <br /> and what are your plans for third quarter 2009? modified sampling and analytes <br /> again? you planning on submitting a.NFAR during the third quarter? if not, <br /> when? <br /> if so, all wells for all constituents typicallylused to-be required to be run. so any <br /> modification I approved for fourth quarter wouldn't..be affected by a NFAR <br /> submitted before then, right?. <br /> but if you want to waive sampling the historically ND wells'for the 'NFAR, go <br /> ahead and. request it and hope the CVRWQCB accepts it when I send up the <br /> NFAR to them. At worst, you .may have to go back and sample these wells <br /> for all the UST analytes- ;-maybe. Changing regulatory world out there.. <br /> plan on approving your TechRat,for NO soil vapor sampling collection. Your <br /> rationale should be included in the NFAR. <br /> get back to me with your plans. I'd like to include:clarifications to any <br /> 'misunderstandings' in :my formal response to your Tech Rat request. <br /> 9/2/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.