Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran, REHS <br /> p?OWN;• C Environmental Health Department ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> Laurie Cotulla,RENS <br /> r.= 2 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> ` Mike Huggins, REHS, RDI <br /> �.' Margaret Lagorio, REHS <br /> •.- - ".• :P Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> Q�! 4 Phone: (209)468.3420 Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RDI <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 Kasey Foley,REHS <br /> July 17, 2009 <br /> Quik Stop Markets ��r < 9 <br /> Mr. Mike Karvelot �•2�•D <br /> 4567 Enterprise Street <br /> Fremont, CA 94538 <br /> Subject: Quik Stop Market #39 RO#: 0428 <br /> 2285 E. Fremont Street CUF#: 14862 <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 Geotracker ID#: T0607700845 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed <br /> Technical Justification for "No Further Action Required" dated June 30, 2009 that was <br /> prepared by Horizon Environmental Inc. <br /> In correspondence dated May 13, 2009, the EHD commented on conclusions your <br /> consultant included in the report of findings for field work conducted in August 2008. It <br /> was the conclusion of your consultant that the site investigation was complete, <br /> remediation was not needed, and that the site should be considered for no further <br /> action. <br /> The EHD notified you in this letter that a soil vapor intrusion evaluation was needed <br /> before a no further action request could be approved. The EHD advised you to provide <br /> a work plan to gather and analyze soil vapor samples for evaluation against the San <br /> Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB), Environmental <br /> Screening Levels (ESL), or to provide technical justification that the dissolved 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (DCA) in the ground water would not provide contaminant vapor to the <br /> surface, to the building, or to the public. The technical justification option was chosen <br /> by your consultant. <br /> The EHD has evaluated the data and your consultant's comments in the technical <br /> justification and has concluded that the plume is characterized adequately and that no <br /> remediation is needed. You may submit a No Further Action report (NFAR) to the EHD. <br /> Please follow the format included in the Tri-Regional Guidelines, Appendix A-Reporting, <br /> section 6.6 for the minimum inclusions required in the report. <br /> 2285 Fremont NFAR CML 7-17-2009.doc <br />