My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006 - 2018
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3505
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231848
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2023 1:33:46 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 1:36:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231848
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002052
FACILITY_NAME
NuStar Terminals Operations Partnership L.P.
STREET_NUMBER
3505
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16203004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3505 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> I, L _ ,moi'"ei - L�.. <br /> JUN 0 12016 <br /> Monitoring System Certification-Page 2 of 3 i.r1�M•� 6�- <br /> Site Address: 3505 Navy Dr. Date of Testing/Sen•icing: 513116 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed- 4.003 <br /> Com Tete the foil ing checklist: <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> IN Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> N Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,fiutctionally tested,and confinned operational? <br /> H Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modem) <br /> 19 N/A operational? <br /> F) Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shutdown if the piping secondary containment <br /> ® N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; d Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes ❑No <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity docs the alarm trigger? 0 % <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement arts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product;❑ Water. If es,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Im Yes ❑ No Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? (Attach set-u reports, i a licable. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: Tank is monitored by 2nd piping sump sensor( Incon TSP-HLS ) -Tested & Passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.