Laserfiche WebLink
SiaLt7 /C Biotechnical Laboratory& Consulting Services '"' <br /> INITIAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION PARAMETERS AND BIOTECHNICAL <br /> ANALYSES IN DETERMINATION OF COMPATIBILITY AND FEASIBILITY <br /> FOR ANY IN SITU OR EX SITU BIOREMEDIAL APPROACH <br /> (Routine Evaluations and Subsequent Procedures) <br /> BioLogic Biotechnical Laboratory and Consulting Services is pleased to provide this outline of a series <br /> of low-cost laboratory analyses which are customarily performed to accommodate any site investigation or <br /> routine monitoring event. These analyses can determine the potential efficacy of a desired bioremedial <br /> approach, and/or provide valuable information to support or negate RBCA (Risk-Based Corrective Action) <br /> and natural attenuation decision processes. At BioLogic, it has been our experience that every contaminated <br /> site may be a candidate for bioremediation, although, as with any environmental cleanup technology, there <br /> is no way of knowing the applicability of a method, or its potential effectiveness, without obtaining <br /> sufficient information on the site-specific environment. Even though applied bioremediation is frequently a <br /> complex environmental cleanup approach dependent on a number of interrelated physical and environ- <br /> mental site-specific conditions, all too often the issue of bioremedial compatibility is taken for granted, or <br /> ignored altogether, and therefore is not afforded similar technical considerations as alternative technologies. <br /> Accordingly, the lack of familiarity with many of the facts associated with the subject of environmental <br /> bioremediation has often resulted in inappropriate site characterizations and data collection, generally with <br /> consequences of erroneous presumptions as to bioremedial efficacy and/or a premature commitment to <br /> more costly alternative technologies. <br /> OBJECTIVES OF BIOTECHNICAL LABORATORY EVALUATIONS <br /> The primary objective of this procedural outline is to provide directional assistance to environmental <br /> practitioners, who may or may not be trained in biotechnical matters, by presenting basic laboratory <br /> support activities for obtaining necessary site-specific data in evaluating either the feasibility of a specific <br /> bioremedial approach, or the often overlooked scientific evidence required to protect decisions of RBCA, <br /> natural attenuation, and/or passive bioremediation processes. The focus of this document is to educate our <br /> clients, before they commit time and resources to a specific approach, as to the prerequisites of biotechnical <br /> considerations for applicability to a specific site (in situ or ex situ) and, subsequently, specify the funda- <br /> mental laboratory analyses that can cost-efficiently be performed to ensure bioremedial compatibility and <br /> project success. BioLogic encourages our clients to use the information provided in this document to <br /> ensure that necessary biotechnical issues are addressed when assessing the feasibility of a bioremedial <br /> approach, and in preparing workplans for client and regulatory approval. <br /> The benefits of information derived from basic baseline biotechnical evaluations is that the results can often <br /> dictate the selection of the appropriate bioremedial method from the diverse range of approaches available, <br /> without incurring the significant costs and time associated with full-scale biotreatability investigations. The <br /> performance of these evaluations, which are designed to be conducted in sequence, comes with the under- <br /> standing that there is no single test or parameter analysis whose results will provide a YES answer to <br /> pursue bioremediation; however, there are a number of single and/or multiple determinations that can give <br /> a NO answer. The benefit of such analyses is that the identification of a single restrictive parameter can <br /> immediately lead to the termination of ongoing bioremedial activities, allowing the client the opportunity to <br /> explore alternate methodologies without wasting significant time and resources on an inappropriate and/or <br /> nonfeasible bioremedial approach. The following flowchart depicts the fundamental steps involved in mak- <br /> ing sound bioremedial determinations. <br /> 1 <br />