Laserfiche WebLink
6. CONCLUSIONS <br /> During the excavation of underground storage tanks at former Chevron SS 9-7780, petroleum <br /> 3 <br /> hydrocarbons were identified in the soils.,,The highest concentration of <br /> hydrocarbons (5,300 <br /> mg/kg at a depth of 1'4 feet (Table 1) in soil was found directly beneath the tanks. The concen- <br /> "i <br /> tration dropped,to 1.2 mg/kg at 36 feet (MWl), and no concentrations of'petroleum hydrocar- <br /> bons greater than detection limits were detected in soils'away from the tank-field (MW2, MW3). <br /> The extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil cannot be extensive, since soil samples taken <br /> from the area surrounding the tank pit or deeper bedeath it did not have concentrations of petro- <br /> leum hydrocarbons greater than method detection limits. Most of the soil containing petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons was excavated and aerated ori the surface . Five months after excavation the levels <br /> of hydrocarbons in the aerated soil had dropped to below detection limits. The hydrocarbon <br /> levels in any unexcavated soils have also probably decreased significantly, Since the pit has been <br /> open to the atmosphere. The decrease in hydrocarbon concentrations in the il soil was reflected in . <br /> significant decreases in hydrocarbons in groundwater (wells MW 1, MW2, MW3), where, for <br /> example, concentrations in MW2 dropped from 2,400'µg/L of TPH in March 1987 to 250 µglL <br /> in February 1988.1 No hydrocarbons were found'in the domestic wells in the vicinity of the site <br /> (Table 4). In the peripheral wells (EA I,through EA4), concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> greater than detection limits were found only in E_A2, and these did not'exceed the MCL for <br /> drinking water in California. <br /> The results of previous and resent investigations indicate that the presence of hydrocarbons in <br /> P P g <br /> the soil and groundwater was very limited. It is reasonable to suppose that it was caused by <br /> small surface spills or by tank overfilling during operation of the station. <br /> A severe drought and the related 30-foot drop of water level under the site have created condi- <br /> tions favoring decreases of hydrocarbon concentrations in soil and groundwater. Relatively high <br /> subsurface temperatures, reflected in a groundwater temperature under the site of 21 C--70 F, <br /> increase the rate of evaporation of volatile hydrocarbons from the water as the water table moves <br /> down. Hydrocarbons absorbed by clayey soils, which extend up to 70 feet beneath the site, are <br /> undergoing further evaporation, biodegradation, and decay in the presenceoF oxygen. All these <br /> alternating processes, the limited extent of hydrocarbons, and the drought during the last four <br /> years have probabiy,:diminished the concentrations of hydrocarbons in the groundwater and soil <br /> to at or below detection limits.' The shifting direction of groundwater flow,'influenced by nearby <br /> domestic wells, has also, to a certain degree,prevented the plume from migrating off the site. <br /> On the basis of the current investigation, etroleurri hydrocarbons have not migrated off the site - <br /> g ., P �- <br /> to nearby water supply wells, and petroleum hydrocarbons that might rerziain in the soil are not <br /> actively contributing'petroleum hydrocarbons to thel groundwater. _ <br /> c67/97780/tx a 8 <br />