Laserfiche WebLink
' 14 May 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0327 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Following well purging, ground water levels in the wells achieved a minimum of 80 percent recharge <br />., prior to sample collection. Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing <br /> disposable polyethylene bailers and transferred to 40-m1 EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0.5 <br /> ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and 1-liter amber bottles without preservative. <br />' Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and <br /> capping. Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and <br /> sampler's initials. <br /> 2.3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br />' Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br />' for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br />'"• respectively) by EPA Method 5030/8015M and LUFT/EPA 8015B, <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethyl benzene and xylene(BTEX)with methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) <br />' by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Ethylene dibromide (EDB), dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), methanol, ethanol, tertiary butanol <br /> (TBA), di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether(ETBE) and tert amyl methyl ether <br /> (TAME), and MTBE by EPA Method 5030/8260. <br /> 0. FINDINGS <br /> NGS <br /> tGround water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 18 December 2001; the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the laboratory data. <br /> 3.1. RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The-depths-to ground water in wells-MW-1, MW-2 and-MW-3 were between•55:7$ and 57.84 feet <br /> below the tops of the well casings; ground water elevations at the site were calculated to be between <br />' 30.31 feet and 31.00 feet below mean sea level. Ground water elevation at the site decreased an <br /> average 1.05 feet between the September 2001 and the December 2001 ground water monitoring <br /> events. Ground water elevations are depicted in Figure 3. <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />