Laserfiche WebLink
H V <br /> r. <br /> i <br /> :JI <br /> 1 <br /> Mr. Binayak Acharya Project 22074-001.001 <br /> February 13, 1996 <br /> Page 3 { <br /> In addition, this estimated time is conservative because the modeling does not account for <br /> any losses that would occur from either biological or nonbiological processes. In reality, <br /> I <br /> such losses, especially over the many years predicted to be necessary for groundwater to <br /> become impacted, are likely to significantly reduce the concentrations of these chemicals or <br /> even entirely prevent them from reaching groundwater. 1 R <br /> CONCLUSION { <br /> This revised fate and transport modeling continues to indi ate that the <br /> compounds in the <br /> soil at the former Nestle site do not present significant risk to groundwater at the site. <br /> Therefore, EMCON reiterates the recommendation that' no further action is needed JJ <br /> concerning the soils at the site. �� I <br /> Please call if you have questions. <br /> I <br /> Sincerely, <br /> i <br /> EMCON <br /> a � <br /> Ray Kaminsky Mark Smolley ± <br /> Environmental Chemist Project Manager {{ <br /> Attachment: Table 1 - Revised Travel Time Evaluation � <br /> I <br /> Y <br /> 10 No. 4650 ' <br /> � i <br /> i <br /> 1, <br /> i <br /> l <br /> I� <br /> II <br /> i4 <br /> I:\PJ2\MAS00918.D0C-96\j1c:3 <br /> I ; <br /> I� I <br /> I <br />