Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 5 <br /> NNW, .� <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:37 PM <br /> To: Sanchez, Laura E. <br /> Subject: RE: Tracy Byron Road Project <br /> well, Ms. Sanchez...as per expected, you did good..Gave me just <br /> what I needed.. <br /> you follow directions well..I'll have to talk to your supervisor...who <br /> is that? (seriously) <br /> As for billing on this site, "TBR-Byron Rd-Corral Hollow", Chevron is <br /> the billing party (Mr. Scot Mansholt) and the account is in good <br /> shape. NO MFR is needed. No check is needed either for me to <br /> start/resume work. <br /> As for the maps, there's a slight concern. Back in July 2004..yes <br /> 2004, I reviewed and noted some concerns on SAIC's July 13, 2004 <br /> work plan, "Work Plan and Time Schedule for Additional Soil and <br /> Groundwater Investigation'; signed by Lee Ignatowicz and Todd Del <br /> Frate. The maps in this work plan were dated 7/13/04. Your maps <br /> are dated 9/22/04. Obviously, some changes have been made, but <br /> without the 'addendum', I can't say fersure. July and <br /> September's still show some of the borings on PRIVATE land (map <br /> shows "SB-37 thru SB-45"). Signed access agreements will be <br /> needed for those parcels. Only the landowner or legal <br /> representative (lawyer, executor, etc) may sign these types of <br /> access docs. I can't issue permits to parcels without the <br /> landowners' approval. <br /> As you know, borings in the City or County right of way require <br /> encroachment permits. <br /> In addition to access agreements and encroachment permits, I'll <br /> also need any new updates/addendums to the work plan if later <br /> than the one I described above. The CVRWQCB work plan approval <br /> letter must be at my office too before I can issue any permits. <br /> Needless to say, there's the $89 per permit application-per parcel <br /> fee. (my initial count looks like seven parcels plus City or County <br /> ROW..you get to find out which municipality has jurisdiction.) <br /> All of these MUST be on my desk before I can issue. <br /> To save check writing, it'll be ok to write ONE large check for ALL of <br /> the permits IF, and ONLY IF, I have ALL of the things I need to <br /> issue each. ONE big check but one missing access agreement or no <br /> encroachment permit, and I can't issue ANY of them..see? Or just <br /> submit each application with its own $89 check. <br /> again, good job... <br /> 5/16/2006 <br />