Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> 3.0 Subsurface Conditions <br /> Four borings were advanced at the locations shown on Figure 1 All borings were advanced to a <br /> depth of 415 feet below surface grade The borings revealed a sequence of clayey silt and sandy <br /> silt strata`�-These strata are weakly to moderately cemented between depths of about surface to 25 <br /> feet,with cementation strength declining with depth as a general rule The clayey silt and sandy silt <br /> may contain laterally discontinuous sand strata and interbeds contained in the silt strata Field <br /> evidence of contaminant presence(sheen, staining and odor) was not observed in any borehole <br /> Groundwater was encountered at depths of about 38 to 39 feet below surface grade occurring in <br /> clayey silt and sandy silt strata The groundwater appeared to be unconfined and entered boreholes <br /> slowly An estimate of groundwater flow direction (to a arbitrary datum) was attempted with field <br /> measurements from the temporaniy rased boreholes However the uncased boreholes were not <br /> open long enough for groundwater levels to equilibrate for adequate depth to groundwater <br /> measurements so a groundwater flow direction could not be plotted On the basis of the available <br /> borehole measurements and chemical data noted herein, the gradient appears to be flat and <br /> suggestive of a westerly flow direction <br /> 4.0 Chemical Analysis <br /> Fight soil samples and up to four groundwater samples were analyzed at a Kiff Analytical,Inc, a <br /> state certified analytical laboratory Samples wtested for the following; Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPHG), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel (TPHD), Benzene <br /> (B),Toluene(T),Ethylbenzene (E), Xylene (X), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Methyl- <br /> . tert-butyl-ether (l1iPI'I3E), and fuel oxygenates tert-Amyl-Methyl-Ether (TAME), Ethyl-tert-Butyl- <br /> Ether (MTBE), Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPS) and tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBE), and 1,2 Dichloroethane <br /> 0,2--DCA), 1,2 Dibromoethane (EDB), .and Ethanol and Methanol using EPA Methods 3550, <br /> 351018015, 5030, 8020 and 5030/8260B The data are presented in Tables 1 and 2 and the <br /> laboratory analytical reports are attached <br /> 5.0 Discussion <br /> Boring B-1 was advanced adjacent to the existing underground tank pit and dispensers and showed <br /> that contaminants were not detected in vadose soil profile samples The laboratory reported 1.1 <br /> milligrams per kilogram TPHD in soil sample B-2-7 @36 feet however the case narrative states that <br /> the result does not match the typical pattern for Diesel Borings B-2, B-3 and B-4 showed that <br /> contaminants were not detected in soil samples <br /> TPHG and Ethanol contaminants were detected in groundwater samples from Bonngs B-2 and B-3 <br /> located downgradient of the tank pit TPHD contaminants were detected in groundwater samples <br /> B-i adjacent to the tank pit However the laboratory reported TPHG in Borings 2 and 3 and TPHD <br /> in Borings 1,2 and 4 however the laboratory case narrative states that these results do not match the <br /> typical pattern for Gasoline and Diesel - <br /> Previous work by Wright sampled soil under the unleaded gasoline fill bucket that revealed 2,100 <br /> pans per billion (ppb) MTBE and 14,500 ppb TBA. Soil beneath the regular gasoline dispenser <br /> revealed 54 ppb MTBE The onginal leak observed at the dispenser appeared limited to the tank pit <br /> and tanks in vadose soil on the basis of this data A soil excavation in the area removed this <br /> • contaminated soil in January 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />