Laserfiche WebLink
CLEARWATER <br />' G R O U P <br /> • Env:ronmentai Servoces <br />' Feasibility Test Results and Discussion <br />' Groundwater Extraction from DPW-1-March 12, 2002 <br /> At the initiation of the test, static depth to water at the initiation of the test was approximately 10 7 feet bgs An <br /> initial pumping rate of 1 0 to 1 5 gpm resulted only in a drawdown of less than 5 feet The pumping rate was then <br />' increased to 1 75 to 2 25 gpm to achieve a drawdown of approximately 15 feet Once this drawdown was achieved, <br /> the pumping rate was reduced to 1 75 gpm to attempt to maintain to water level near 25 feet bgs Pumping then <br />' continued for approximately one hour at a pumping rate of l 75 gpm and the water level was maintained between 24 <br /> and 25 feet bgs Over 200 gallons of groundwater was pumped from DPW-1 on March 12,2002 <br />' Throughout the step testing, drawdown was measured in nearby wells MW-513, MW-1, MW-6, and MW-7 Well <br /> MW-5B, which is the nearest to DPW-1 by approximately 10 feet, experienced a maximum drawdown of 1 36 feet <br />' below the initial water level measurement before pumping in DPW-1 began No drawdown was witnessed in wells <br /> MW-1,MW-6 and MW-7 GWE test data is included in Table 3 <br />' The groundwater sample collected at the end of the step-test contained elevated concentrations of contaminants The <br /> • water sample contained TPHg at 42,000 µglL and benzene at 6,300 lig/L, but MTBE was not detected Table 2 <br />' summarizes the analytical data of collected groundwater samples Table 3 summarizes GWE data The laboratory <br /> analytical report and chain-of-custody is included in Appendix C <br /> t The results of step-test indicate that a pumping rate of approximately 1 75 gpm could sufficiently dewater the well to <br /> P P P S <br />' provide approximately 15 feet of non-submerged well screen prior to beginning soil vapor extraction It was <br /> anticipated that once SVE testing began, a greater pumping rate would be required with each increase in vacuum, <br /> since applying a vacuum to the well would draw the water upwards <br /> 1 <br /> Dual-Phase GWE/SVE Test Results—March 13, 2002 <br />' Prior to initiating SVE, well DPW-1 was dewatered to approximately 25 feet bgs Once SVE step testing began a <br /> pumping rate of 2 1 to 2 2 gpm(10 to 40 in w c)and 2 5 gpm(50 in w c) was required to maintain the water level <br /> at 25 feet bgs, so that at least 15 feet of well screen was not submerged for SVE During the combined GWE/SVE <br />' test, application of moderate vacuums(10 and 20 inches of water)at DPW-1 with 15 feet of screen available resulted <br /> in air flows at DPW-1 between 2 3 and 6 0 cubic feet per minute (cfm) from the well Application of vacuums <br />' ranging from 30 to 40 in w c resulted in flow rates ranging between 6 and 8 5 cfm A vacuum of 50 in w c <br /> achieved flow rates between 10 and 11 in w c Therefore, there did appear to be a direct relationship between the <br />' increase in vacuum and increase in air flow in DPW-1 as demonstrated in Table 4 and the associated chart <br /> 1 <br /> ZB178C Feas Test Report 6 May 9, 2002 <br />