Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> CLEAmRW- ATER <br /> G R O U P, I N C <br /> E,nnonnrenial service, <br /> sample form MW-2 only slightly exceeded laboratory reporting limits Results of this phase of investigation were <br /> presented in Clearwater's Subsurface Investigation Report dated November 20, 1997 <br /> In January 1999, Clearwater supervised the installation of three additional monitoring wells(MW-4,MW-5, and MW-6) <br /> to further evaluate the extent of contaminants in the subsurface Results of sampling indicated that the extent of sorbed- <br /> phase contamination Burro, u� nding the former UST complex had been adequately delineated The results of group for <br /> ___�---— <br /> sampling, however, indicated that the downgradient extent of dissolved-phase gasoline contaminants remained <br /> undelineated The presence of high concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons cross-gradient (MW-6) from the former <br /> USTs also suggested the presence of possible additional off-site sources Preliminary inquiries regarding the nature of <br /> possible additional sources indicated that fuel transport pipelines may be present in the immediate vicinity of the site <br /> Based on these results, Clearwater recommended additional downgradient investigation to determine the extent of the <br /> contaminant plume and also to evaluate the possible contribution from potential off-site sources The results of this phase <br /> of investigation were presented in Clearwater's Well Installation and Groundwater Monitoring Report-First Quarter 1999 <br /> dated May 7, 1999 <br /> The site is predominantly underlain by silts and clays to a depth of approximately 25 feet bgs, with localized, non- No <br /> continuous sand lenses An apparently laterally continuous sand unit is present from approximately 25 to 35 feet bgs, Sg- r <br /> which is underlain by.2 clay, Depth to groundwater fluctuates between approximately 6 and 11 feet bgs annually, and 5,141 <br /> Sobsterved flaw directions have historically been toward the south-southeast <br /> Z'1�f t <br /> <ad.�y j�O,y <br />�``4 3'I.0 Proposed Scope of Additional Investigation 5 <br /> 5- ' <br /> 5 35' S .e( [:��` <br /> h� f,-,The pit ose of the proposed work is further evaluation of the distribution of gasoline contaminants downgradient from <br /> -� ^6 5 uu Sow C1 25 <br /> zo' Sithe fol UST system, and to repair well MW-5 To accomplish this goal, the following scope of work will be 3S l <br /> pefformed <br /> q ZO1 1t i <br /> • Install up to eight Geoprobe soil borings to approximately 20 feet bgs for collection of soil and groundwater samples 5 � <br /> to attempt to complete lateral delineation of dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the subject <br /> release,and to investigate the possible impact of off-site sources Three borings will be located on each side of South <br /> Fresno Avenue located so as to intersect groundwater flowing through and to the north and south of the current well 5s- <br /> configuration One boring will be located on each of the north and west site boundaries in order to Investigate <br /> possible off-site contamination extending from upgradient locations onto the subject property Proposed boring <br /> locations are shown on Figure 2 �`1 <br /> • Drill-out and re-install momtonng well MW-5,the casing of which was damaged during recent resurfacing activities <br /> i <br /> • Continue quarterly groundwater monitoring to determine trends in contaminant concentrations and hydrogeologic <br /> conditions <br /> All work will be conducted in accordance with the LUFT Field Manual, the Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations, <br /> • and Article 11 Corrective Action Regulations of Chapter 16 Under Storage Tanks Regulations <br /> Ms Lon Duncan 2 September 30 1999 <br />