Laserfiche WebLink
■ <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> This report presents the zesults of a subsurface <br /> investigation for hydrocarbon contamination on the property <br /> located at 308 Grant Street in Stockton, California <br /> (Figure 1) . The property was formerly occupied by De Rollo <br /> Mazda, an automobile sales and service business. The site <br /> previously had three underground (u/g) storage tanks, two <br /> of which dispensed gasoline, and one used for storage of <br /> waste motor oil ('Figure 2) . <br /> On April 21, 1987, a 1000 gallon underground u/g gasoline <br /> storage tank (Tank A) was removed from the subject property <br /> (Figure 2). Field inspection during tank removal noted holes <br /> in the tank. A soil sample was collected from beneath the <br /> tank at a depth of 14 feet below grade. The laboratory <br /> results for the sample recorded benzene, toluene, xylenes <br /> and total petroleum hydrocarbon (BTX/TPH) concentrations of <br /> 120, 470, 870, and 2400 parts per million (ppm) , <br /> respectively (Table 1) . <br /> On October 19, 1988, a 5000 gallon u/g gasoline tank (Tank <br /> B) and a 300 gallon u/g waste oil tank (Tank C) were removed <br /> from the project site (Figure 2 ) . Soil samples were <br /> collected from each end of the gasoline tank pit at a depth <br /> of approximately 15 feet below grade. The samples were <br /> analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX); <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH); ethylene <br /> dibromide (EDB) and tetra ethyl lead (TEL). Laboratory <br /> results for the sample indicated concentrations of TPH and <br /> TEL above State designated levels, (Marshack, 1986) in the <br /> north end of the former tank pit." The laboratory results <br /> are summarizes in Table 2. . <br /> A soil sample was also recovered from beneath the waste oil <br /> tank at a depth of approximately ppraximately 6 feet below grade. The <br /> sample was analyzed for BTEX, TPH, chlorinated hydrocarbons, <br /> metals and PCB's. Laboratory results for these <br /> constituents, summarized in Table 3, recorded concentrations <br /> less than method detection limits for all constituents <br /> except chloroform at� 7 parts per billion (ppb) and <br /> trichloroethane at 30: ppb. These levels are significantly <br /> below the state designated levels to protect groundwater at <br /> a hypothetical average site <br /> yp g (rarshack 1986) . A May 10, 1989 <br /> correspondence from the San ,Joaquin County Public Health . <br /> - -----.. _ <br /> Services.. .Environmental._....Health Divis..ion_...._(SJCPHSEHD) required <br /> assessment of chloroform and trichloroethane in addition to <br /> the subsurface hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> This investigation was conducted in accordance with <br /> WaterWork's proposal dated July 10, 1989, which was - . <br /> submitted to the SJCPHSEHD for prior approval. This <br /> proposal was drafted and the investigation conducted in <br /> accordance with the Tri Regional Guidelines prepared by the <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> 1 <br />