Laserfiche WebLink
T <br /> c <br /> t <br /> Fc 4 <br /> i <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> : t <br /> This report presents the results of a subsurface <br /> investigation for hydrocarbon contamination on the property <br /> located at 308 Grant Street in Stockton, California <br /> (Figure 1) _ The property was formerly occupied by De Rollo <br /> Mazda, an automobile sales and service business. The site <br /> previously had three underground (u/g) storage tanks, two <br /> of which dispensed gasoline, and one used for storage of <br /> waste motor oil (Figure 2). <br /> On April 21, L2V, a 1000 gallon underground u/g gasoline <br /> storage tank (Tank A) was removed from the subject property <br /> (Figure 2). Field inspection during tank removal noted holes <br /> in the tank. A soil sample was collected from beneath the <br /> tank at a depth of 14 feet below grade. The laboratory <br /> results for the sample recorded benzene, toluene, xylenes <br /> and total trnlpuM_-hydrocarbon (BTX/TPH) concentrations of <br /> 120, 470, 520, and 24_x. parts per million ( ppm) , <br /> respectively (Table 1) . <br /> r On October 19, 1988, a 5000 gallon u/g gasoline tank (Tank <br /> B) and a 300 gallon u/g waste oil tank (Tank C) were removed <br /> from the project site (Figure 2 ) . Soil samples were <br /> collected from each end of the gasoline tank pit at a dept�i <br /> of. approximately 15 feet below grade. The samples were <br /> analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX); <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH); ethylene <br /> dibromide (EDB) and tetra ethyl lead (TEL) . Laboratory <br /> results for the sample indicated concentrations of TPH and <br />►'® TEL above State designated levels (Marshack, 1986) in the <br /> E north end of the former tank pit. The laboratory results <br /> } are summarized in Table 2. <br /> A soil sample was also recovered from beneath the waste oil <br /> tank at a depth of approximately 6 feet below grade. The <br /> sample was analyzed for BTEX, TPH, chlorinated hydrocarbons, <br /> metals and PCB ' s. Laboratory results for these <br /> rA constituents, summarized in Table 3, recorded concentrations <br /> less than method detection limits for all constituents <br /> except ch1D2ioXDxlp at 7 parts per billion (_pp_ ) and <br /> richloroethane . at 30 ppb, These levels are significantly <br /> C. below the state designated levels to protect groundwater at <br /> a hypothetical average site (Marshack 1986). A May 10, 1989 <br /> correspondence from the San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services Environmental Health Division (SJCPHSEHD) required <br /> assessment of chloroform and trichloroethane in addition to <br /> the subsurface hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> ' 3 This investigation' was conducted in accordance with <br /> WaterWork' s proposal dated July 10, ' 1989, which was <br /> submitted to the SJCPHSEHD for prior approval This <br /> proposal was drafted and the investigation conducted in <br /> Regional accordance with the Tri Re Guidelines <br /> ,..f g' prepared by the <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> 1 <br /> i 1 <br />