My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
340
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545199
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 9:28:11 AM
Creation date
1/17/2020 8:34:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0545199
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005789
FACILITY_NAME
JUANITA MARKET #4
STREET_NUMBER
340
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
23303027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
340 W GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 4_0 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS <br /> As shown in Tablet, no hydrocarbon residues were found in groundwater at the site. No <br /> floating product(gasoline) was observed during sampling. The low concentrations of total <br /> lead found in the groundwater (0.0075 to 0.0082 mg/L) are believed to be background <br /> concentrations. <br /> As a result of drilling access restrictions and a lack of prior site specific groundwater <br /> gradient data, this study did not result in water quality data downgradient of the former <br /> tank site. <br /> In spite of the lack of downgradient data, the fact that no hydrocarbon compounds were <br /> detected in any of the wells, especially the former tank location well, suggests there is <br /> likely no detectable hydrocarbon impact to groundwater beneath the site. <br /> As wells MW-2 and MW-3 are both upgradient from the former tank location, the absence <br /> of hydrocarbons in these wells was not unexpeccted. The most significant result of this <br /> study is the fact that both rounds of sampling-revealed no detectable hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater from MW-1 located directly in the former tank location. <br /> 5.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 5.1 Summary of Findinaa <br /> The following is a summary of the findings based on the field investigation, analytical <br /> results and interpretations: <br /> Three groundwater monitoring wells have been constructed on the site. <br /> r The groundwater flow direction is to the northwest'and the gradient magnitude is <br /> 0.0016 ftfft. <br /> r <br /> Based on`two separate rounds of sampling and analysis, it appears that no <br /> hydrocarbon residues are present in the groundwater beneath the former tank <br /> location. <br /> 5.2 Recommendations <br /> Based on the results of this study, WESTON believes that there is no observable <br /> hydrocarbon impact to the groundwater beneath the site. Therefore, WESTON <br /> recommends that no further work be done on the site. <br /> t,a <br /> - 9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.