My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011769
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRAND CANAL
>
2233
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0504944
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 9:24:47 AM
Creation date
1/17/2020 8:54:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011769
RECORD_ID
PR0504944
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006428
FACILITY_NAME
BRIDGES SPECIALTY CENTER, THE
STREET_NUMBER
2233
STREET_NAME
GRAND CANAL
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
11011006
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2233 GRAND CANAL BLVD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Siskiyou County The remedial action taken place at sacs that have <br /> hydraulic lifts are due to underground tanks or piping <br /> leaks The cleanup has always been per the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board in that area. There are <br /> numerous saes under cleanup. Never was there a <br /> mention of hydraulic fluid being considered as part of <br /> the contamination sample for <br /> Solano County NIA <br /> Sonoma County This County does not keep or maintain records <br /> regarding hydraulic lifts. However, we estimated that <br /> F about 10% of our UST facilities have hydraulic lifts. <br /> Stanislaus County 'There have been two HLT leaks that were confined <br /> to the soil zone, but were still a threat to a wale <br /> r <br /> supply. The contamination never reached ground <br /> water because theg round water level was <br /> intermittently deep due to six consecutive drought <br /> years. Had <br /> the two HLTs not been removed and had <br /> there not been extensive over-excavation of the <br /> contaminated soils, the ground water would have been V <br /> �I contaminated as soon as the ground water level rose. <br /> Consequently, in both cases a water supply would <br /> have been directly affected." <br /> Tulare County NIA <br /> Santa Clara Valley "Generally, leaks have only reached ground water <br /> Water Distract [where] the depth to water is very shallow, i.e., less <br /> (LOP) than 10 feet. . . (None of the leaks threatened a <br /> water supply ] Although one to three leaks have been <br /> at sites where there is ongoing unrelated ground water <br /> cleanupaction. These are sites overseen by the San <br /> i <br /> { Francisco Bay Regional Water Board " <br /> 11 <br /> JI� <br /> 1 <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.