My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012704
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0503286
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 1:19:02 PM
Creation date
1/17/2020 10:49:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012704
RECORD_ID
PR0503286
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0005766
FACILITY_NAME
MOBIL OIL BULK PLANT
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25027008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
500 E GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ C � <br /> :.a <br /> `- in and carbon adsorption may be <br /> Combined use of air strippinwide Ofg,r 1 constituents have a requirements ex warranted when: { ent treatment req <br /> volatilities; (2) suing um in rates are <br /> or (3) hydrocarbon con centrainon8electively removes the <br /> relatively high. Air stripping <br /> most volatile components from toundstforer aremoval nd eby carbon <br /> residuals of less volatile comp tower <br /> adsorption Carbon adsorption is also often used to remove <br /> hose carbon is significantly more efficient <br /> constituents from the air emitted from the stripping <br /> since vapor-p air stripping <br /> than liquid-Phase carbon. Generallbercost effective where <br /> followed by carbon adsorption maY round water exceed <br /> hydrocarbon concentrations in the g <br /> 10 ppm. <br /> v <br /> ti <br /> solved <br /> ganic <br /> This treatment method by means ofschemi-calroxidation. <br /> constituents in water by <br /> as a catalyst in the chemical <br /> Ultraviolet light (UV) <br /> os as in water by its combined <br /> oxidation of organic comp <br /> - effect upon the organic contaminant and its reaction with <br /> eroxide. Hydrogen peroxide radicals ;ormed by <br /> hydrogen P powerful chemical oxidants <br /> reaction with W light arely organic compound in the water. <br /> which will react with amaterials costs and susceptibility <br /> Due to high energy burnout of W lights, changes in <br /> to problems (e-g. ► leading to ineffective treatment <br /> influent concentrations this method was determined not <br /> alitY,and a wer applicablento this site- <br /> - t qu <br /> to be app <br /> Lig the gradient between the <br /> Reinjection can be used to increase the recovery rate of <br /> the plume by locally increas g <br /> reinjection and withdrawal points. Reinjection isnormally <br /> rein] lex and economically costly tion <br /> more technically come product <br /> • discharge methods. Technical ifundesirableifreehPs op <br /> include the potential to promote ration into previously <br /> or dissolved-phase <br /> plume 9 Reinjection also creates the <br /> unaffected ground water. ReimofLO <br /> possibility of reintroducing low concentrnecessitate more <br /> contaminants into the aquifer, which may <br /> stringent treatment system design parameters. <br /> reinjection is generally perceived as not <br /> Additionally, rein] <br /> being a preferred method for treated water discharge- <br /> _ truck <br /> This option would involve onsite storage of -treated water <br /> rn or construction projects. <br /> in above ground tanks with transportation of water by <br /> offsite for reuse in landscaping <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.