Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> ILLL <br /> The results of the laboratory analysis of ground water <br /> samples are presented in Table 1. The official laboratory <br /> reports and chain of custody documents are included in <br /> Appendix G. <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> ~ A brief description of site geology and hydrogeology based on <br /> the results of the drilling activities is presented below. <br /> The results of field activities and laboratory analysis <br /> of the soil and ground water samples collected during <br /> this <br /> investigation and from previous investigations are also <br /> discussed below. <br /> 5.1ll r,P�v <br /> Boring logs generated during this and previous subsurface <br /> investigations indicate that the stratigraphy <br /> beneath <br /> h the <br /> site is complex and varies ve_tically a <br /> The area of excavation has been backfilled with sandy gravel <br /> to a depth of approximately 10 feet below grade. The <br /> predominant soil types at the site are sand/silt/clay <br /> mixtures with raccasioroximatelyal 1141feet sbelow gradethat d from <br /> ground surface to aPP <br /> generally underlies the sand/silt, silty clay was encountered <br /> Clay mixture. At <br /> approximately 19 feet below grade, <br /> in all soil borings to the total depth of the borings. <br /> Figure 4 shows the northwest-southeast hydrogeologic cross <br /> section A-A' ' while the west--east hydrogeologic cross <br /> section B-B' is shown in Figure 5. <br /> 5.2 <br /> €1, Ground water was first encountered during drilling and <br /> sampling of all borings at depths of appprximately1005tfeet <br /> 11 feet below grade, stabilizing at approximately <br /> below grade. <br /> Ground water elevations from weregusedto <br /> Wel1AW-1 through <br /> develop the <br /> Aw-8, as measured on May <br /> ground water potentiometric surface map shown in Figure 3. <br /> r flow direction ioottheees <br /> The general ground watenortheast, with <br /> calculated from these measurements, is } <br /> an average hydraulic gradient of 0.014 foot per foot across <br /> the site. <br /> 9 <br />