Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> September 5, 1997 Pete Wilson <br /> Cam Governor <br /> State Water Mr• Michael D. McGranahan, Administrator <br /> Resources Mr. Louis Moresco, Jr., Liquidating Trust <br /> Control Board P.O.Box 5018 <br /> Modesto, CA 95352 <br /> Division of <br /> Clean Water <br /> Programs pRE_AppROVAL OF CORRECTIVE ACTION COSTS, CLAIM NO. 10323, <br /> Mailing Address: SITE ADDRESS: 16865 GAWNE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95205 <br /> P.O.Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento,CA <br /> 94244-2120 I have reviewed your request, received on June 16, 1997, for pre-approval of corrective action <br /> 2014 T street, costs; I will place these documents in your file for future reference. I have included a copy of <br /> ; please use this form in the future for requesting pre- <br /> Suite 130 the"Cost Pre-Approval Request" form <br /> 9581a��'CA <br /> approval of corrective actions costs. <br /> (916)2274374 <br /> FAX(916)227-4530 <br /> With the following provisions, the total cost pre-approved as eligible for reimbursement for <br /> World Wide Web completing the April 8, 1997, Geological Technics workplan approved by the San Joaquin <br /> hop://www.swmb.ca <br /> gov/�-cwphome/ County ERD (County) in their April 11, 1997 letter, is $74,335; see the table below or a <br /> fundhome.htm breakdown of costs. (The total amount approved for payment through Request No. 3 for work <br /> at your site that has been directed and approved by the County is $34,604.) <br /> Be aware that this pre-approval does not constitute a decision on reimbursement: all <br /> reasonable and necessary corrective action costs for work directed and approved by the <br /> County will be eligible for reimbursement per the terms of your Letter of Commitment at costs <br /> consistent with those pre-approved in this letter. <br /> All future costs for corrective action must be approved in writing by Fund staff. <br /> Future costs for corrective action must meet the requirements of <br /> Article Il, Chapter 16, Underground Storage Tank Regulations. <br /> • The actual costs and scope of work performed must be consistent with the pre-approval for <br /> it to remain valid. <br /> • The work products must be acceptable to the County and the Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board. <br /> • It is my opinion that it is unnecessary to obtain three bids for this scope of work; the Fund's <br /> three bid requirement is waived for this scope of work. <br /> • If a different scope of work becomes necessary, then you must request pre-approval of costs <br /> for the new scope of work. <br /> • Although I have referred to the Geological Technics proposal in my pre-approval above, <br /> please be aware that you will be entering into a private contract: the State of California <br /> cannot compel you to sign any specific contract. This letter pre-approves the costs as <br /> presented in the proposal dated June 12, 1997 by Geological Technics for conducting the <br /> work approved by the County for implementing the April 8, 1997, Geological Technics <br /> workplan. <br /> Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources,and <br /> Recycled Paper ensure their proper allocation and eJfrcient use for the benefit of present and future generations. <br />