My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GAWNE
>
16865
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505611
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2020 5:37:09 PM
Creation date
1/17/2020 4:31:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0505611
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0006807
FACILITY_NAME
MORESCO PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
16865
STREET_NAME
GAWNE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
18309009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
16865 GAWNE RD
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4'- <br /> 1� J <br /> i f7 1 <br /> ► FP, C <br /> Ge o fogicaf Technics Inc. t <br /> 2741 xiverRoarl <br /> modesw,California 95351 v <br /> (209)538-6424IFax#538-5852 <br /> February 4, 1999 <br /> Project No.: 251.3 <br /> Project Name: McGranahan (Gawne Road) <br /> Mr. L. Kris Brown <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> 2014 T Street, Suite 130 <br /> P.O. Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento, CA 94244-2120 ;. <br /> RE: February 2, 1999 Letter <br /> McGranahan - Former Moresco Property, 16865 Gawne Road, Stockton, CA <br /> USTCFP Claim No.: 010323; Site Code No.: 505486 <br /> Dear Mr. Brown: <br /> Thank you for your review of the cost pre-approval request for the site at 16865 Gawne Road, <br /> Stockton. <br /> With regards to you letter of pre-approval of corrective action costs dated February 2, 1999, 1 <br /> have the following questions to be clarified before this work is performed. After you review my <br /> questions, please give me a call and we can discuss these issues. <br /> 1. Time Considerations: <br /> • Drilling a borehole with V&W is fairly quick once the drill rig is set up. It takes <br /> approximately 4 minutes to drill and sample every five feet. By 10 AM we will be at 70 <br /> feet. <br /> • Lab testing of MTBE by 8260 takes approximately 1.5 to 2 hours per sample. So by 12 <br /> PM a mobile lab should have the results from the 70-foot sample. According to your <br /> letter, at this point we could decide whether or not to continue drilling. <br /> • The problem I see is with the timing of the other samples. Your letter states that if <br /> .. down to-to -then drilling should continue with= <br /> petroleum contamination=is-found <br /> samples being tested at 5-foot intervals down to groundwater. If contamination is found <br /> every five feet down to groundwater then the well should be installed. If we wait the 1.5 <br /> to 2 hours for each sample to be tested we would be out there for up to another 16 hours <br /> before a decision could be made as to whether or not the well is going to be installed. <br /> • If we assume that drilling would not wait for the lab test results, drilling from 70 feet <br /> .down to 110 feet should be complete at approximately 12 PM. At that point the last soil <br /> sample would go into the lab and the drill rig would go on standby for two hours until the <br /> testing is complete. At 2 PM we could decide if the well would be installed or not. <br /> 2. Cost Considerations' <br /> There are two primary cost considerations: <br /> • Lab Fees - mobile lab fees are more expensive then stationary labs and'to make the <br /> determination on a five foot interval from 70 feet to 110 feet will take twice as many <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.