My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT
>
540
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0518833
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2020 2:00:22 PM
Creation date
1/22/2020 1:52:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0518833
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014177
FACILITY_NAME
WRENCHERS
STREET_NUMBER
540
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
GRANT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13922601
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
540 N GRANT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN �TY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES/ENVIRONMENTAL HEO DIVISION <br /> t• ST WORKSHEET FOR SITE CLOSURE EVALUATION DATE Z 2-(O cr <br /> NAME OF FACILITY G R-S ISWEEPS CODE <br /> ADDRESS 'rj KO C-1 Y-0 tA+ Cjc� TANK ID it - <br /> TANK S12E FUEL TYPE r <br /> II. GENERAL SITE HISTORY EivYl" �}SSGsssu�v�m <br /> e** <br /> Is permit current? Yes No Permit q - Facility Status Code Doc.Soil/GW Cont Yes No <br /> Number of Tanks at facility Age of Tanks(it available) Tank Steel Fbrgl Sngt Dual <br /> III. TANK HISTORY - <br /> Was Tank tested? Yes No Failed prec' test ? Yes No If yes, give date(s) <br /> Was a repair made to the tank s '� Yes No If yes, what was repaired? <br /> Was repair done and nspection7 Yes No Were soil samples analyzed? Yes No 6TXE TPH-G TPH-D Pb/EDB <br /> Type of ure/discharge catastrophic long-term leakage overfill unknown other: <br /> !V. REMOVAL HISTORY (ATTACH INSPECTION REPORT FOR SITE DETAILS/COLLECT DATA FOR LEACHING POTENTIAL ANALYSIS) <br /> Soil Samples Received Yes / No Depth to Ground Water 3SI Ref/Year Average Annual Precipitation I <br /> On-Site Wetl(s) Yes No Number 8 Type Irr Dom Pub <br /> S Score S Score S <br /> Distance to Wetl(s) from Tank ft; ft; ft C 10 pts C 9 pts C <br /> 0 if 0 if 0 R condition R condition R V. Site Feature - Leaching Potential Analysis E is met E is met E <br /> Minimum Depth to groundwater from the Soil Sample (feet) >100 51-100 S 25-50\1 <br /> Fractures in subsurface (applies to foothills or mountain areas) I O None Unknown Present <br /> Average Annual Precipitation (inches) xxxxxx <10 9 10-25 xxxxxxx 26-40\2 <br /> Man-Made conduits which increase vertical migration <br /> of leachate (i.e., septic systems, water wells, ponds) None Unknown Present <br /> Unique site features: Recharge area, coarse soil, nearby wells. At least More than <br /> xmmx None 92 one one <br /> COLUMN TOTALS»>TOTAL POINTS V + Z 7 + <br /> Sample Result: (B T X OR E) RANGE OF TOTAL POINTS 49 pts or more 41 - 48 pts 40 pts or less <br /> B T X E B T % E <br /> MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE B-T-X-E LEVELS (PPM) 1 50 50 50 .3 .3 1. NA\3 <br /> Sample Resutt: t'9-PPn. GASOLINE 1000 100 10 <br /> ?� MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TPH LEVELS (PPM) <br /> 2 10 TPH AO DIESEL 10,000 1000 100 <br /> ,FOOTNOTES: **If documented soil and/or ground water contamination is present, do not comp ate the leaching potential <br /> analysis. (i.e., site is currently on UGT Contamination List for soil or ground water.) <br /> \1 If depth is > 5 ft. and < 25 ft., score 0 points. if depth <=5 ft., do not use table. <br /> \2 If precipitation is > 40 inches, score 0 points. <br /> \3 Levels for BTXBE are not applicable at a TPH concentration of 10 ppm (gasoline) or 100 ppm (diesel). <br /> . STAFF RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION <br /> 1. Are BTX 8 E or TPH Concentrations > Allowable Levels *Yes No <br /> 2. Recommend Site Closure Yes No If Yes, Refer to Site Mitigation for Evaluation - <br /> 1. REVIEW EVALUATION - TO BE COMPLETED BY A SUPERVISOR/SENIOR <br /> CONCUR,.WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR CLOSURE YES NO REFERRED TO SITE MITIGATION FOR EVALUATION YES NO <br /> DATE REFERRED / / DATE CLOSURE LETTER MAILED <br /> NAME OF <br /> EVALUATOR <br /> EH 23 80 (UGTWKSHT)\5/90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.