Laserfiche WebLink
JOHN JOHNSON <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> to Maintaining High Quality of Waters in California) requires dischargers to cleanup releases impacting <br /> soil and groundwater to restore and/or protect groundwater to its original background levels. As the <br /> constituents of gasoline do not naturally occur in groundwater in this area,background levels are <br /> considered to be undetectable levels using the most stringent detection limits available. Please be advised <br /> that the remedial option chosen for this site must be capable of achieving this cleanup objective. <br /> PHS/EBD has determined the following deficiencies with respect to the Remediation Workplan. <br /> Section 1.2 and Section 4.1 <br /> The site background and contaminant information in the proposal is simplified and limited. It <br /> inadequately describes the scope of the known impacted area and fails to mention the impacted areas that <br /> still require assessment. <br /> Figures 1 and 2 are based on limited groundwater data from the last phase of field work and may not be <br /> entirely accurate. Groundwater monitoring wells must be installed to the north of monitoring wells <br /> MW#1 and MW#4 to determine the full extent of the groundwater contaminant plume in these <br /> directions. A monitoring well must be installed in the area between monitoring wells MW#1 and MW#3 <br /> as this area has no current data point to monitor the groundwater plume. Depending on the results of <br /> groundwater sampling from this well, an additional well may need to be installed to the southwest to <br /> determine the full extent of the plume in this direction. <br /> The simplicity and lack of geological and geochemical detail in these figures is alarming and indicate the <br /> need for additional physical data. Once this data is obtained, it is important that any discussions, <br /> assumptions,justifications and pictorial presentations based on the data is prepared by an appropriately <br /> qualified professional in an acceptable report format. An acceptable reporting format can be found in the <br /> Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation of Underground <br /> Tank Sites-Appendix A (enclosed). <br /> It is not the geometry of the soil and groundwater plumes that is important but it is the concentrations ✓ <br /> and distribution of hydrocarbons within the complex strata of unsaturated and saturated soils underlying <br /> the site that is important. The concentrations and distribution of hydrocarbons in the soil at the site has <br /> not yet been definitively determined with physical data. This soil assessment is an absolute requirement <br /> and must be completed at this site. <br /> Section 4.2 <br /> The effectiveness of bioremediation at underground storage tank sites has been shown to be dependant on <br /> several complex site specific environmental and chemical factors. The statement made in this section on <br /> the sandy soils of this site is in error. The soil boring logs do show that some areas have sandy soils but, <br /> overall the soil lithology is much more complex and, as mentioned previously, not completely known. <br /> Written approval from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board is required before any <br /> substance can be introduced into the soil and/or groundwater at this site. The Regional Water Quality <br /> Control Board may require a permit to introduce the bacteria to ground and may also impose additional <br /> monitoring requirements. <br /> San Joaquin County well standards specify the construction and destruction standards for soil borings and <br /> monitoring wells. Any temporary soil borings used for the infiltration of bacteria would not be allowed to <br /> stay open overnight and must be destroyed as soon as the infiltration process is complete. All soil borings <br /> or monitoring wells must be destroyed with a neat cement grout. The construction of the proposed <br />