ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002354 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

it(V8V( A S 5 0 C I A T E 5 I N C model that includes analytical data collected during removal of a waste oil tank from the site in September 2003 The requested workplan was submitted by ATC on February 2, 2004 On September 11 and 12, 2003, a 500-gallon capacity used oil UST was excavated and removed from the site respectively, by Walton Engineering, Inc Petroleum hydrocarbons and metals were detected in a soil sample collected from below the former location of the UST from a depth of approximately seven feet bgs Refer to Grayland Environmental's Underground Storage Tank and Fuel Dispenser Removal Report, dated October 16, 2003, for more information In September 23 and 24, 2003, H2OGEOL collected groundwater samples from MW1 and MW4 through MW8 Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater samples collected from these wells The reported groundwater flow direction was to the north Refer to H2OGEOL's Third Quarter, 2003 Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated October 31, 2003, for more information SAMPLING ACTIVITIES On March 2, 2004, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW 1 and MW4 through MW8 Monitoring wells MW2 and MW3 are sampled annually The locations of the wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured in groundwater purged from the monitoring wells and recorded A minimum of three well casing volumes were purged from each monitoring well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using disposable polyethylene bailers The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon Laboratories Inc (ELAP Cert No 2359) in Ceres, California for chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) utilizing EPA method 8015M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) utilizing EPA method 802013, and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETRE) di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary amyl ether (TAME), tertiary butyl ether (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA method 8260B Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION Water level measurements were collected from wells MW 1 through MWS on March 2, 2004 Water levels in the shallow aquifer ranged from 4 57 to 6 82 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations, representing an average increase in the shallow water table elevation of approximately 0 64 feet since November 200k The water level data were used to develop the JV- ep groundwater elevation contour map (Figure VAssuming that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed towards the south The • average hydraulic gradient on March 2, 2004 was calculated to be 0 0008 ft/ft or approximately 4 ft/mile A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 J sleniromental125847100371reportsllgr-2004 doe 3