Laserfiche WebLink
(VATC <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> context of a site conceptual model that includes analytical data collected during removal of a <br /> waste oil tank from the site in September 2003. <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On November 26, 2003, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells <br /> MWI through MW8. The locations of the wells are shown on Figure 2. Prior to collection of <br /> groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were <br /> measured in the monitoring wells and recorded. A minimum of three well casing volumes were <br /> purged from each monitoring well prior to sampling. The wells were allowed to recover and <br /> samples were collected from each well using disposable polyethylene bailers. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon <br /> Laboratories Inc. (ELAP Cert. No. 2359) in Ceres, California for chemical analysis of TPHg <br /> utilizing EPA method 8015 modified; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) <br /> utilizing EPA method 8020; and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (ETBE) di-isopropyl ether (RIPE), tertiary amyl ether (TAME), tertiary butyl ether (TBA), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA method 8260. <br /> Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1. <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW1 through MW8 on November 26, <br /> 2003. Water levels in the shallow aquifer ranged from 5.24 to 7.37 feet below the tops of the <br /> well casing elevations, representing an average increase in the shallow water table elevation of <br /> approximately 0.39 feet since September 2003. The water level data were used to develop the <br /> groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 2). Assuming that horizontal isotropic conditions <br /> prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed towards the north. The <br /> average hydraulic gradient on November 26, 2003 was calculated to be 0.001 ft/ft or <br /> approximately 5 ft/mile. A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1. <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater sample collected from well MW4 contained detectable concentrations of TPHg, <br /> benzene, and ethyl benzene constituents. Groundwater samples collected from wells MW 1, <br /> MW2, MW3 and MW5 through MW8 contained no detectable concentrations of TPHg or BTEX <br /> constituents. Grgundwater samples collected from wells MW1, MW4, MW5, MW6, and MW8 <br /> contained detectable concentrations MTBE ranging from 9.0 parts per billion (ppb) in MW 1 to <br /> 260 ppb in well MW5. The groundwater sample from well MW4 contained a detectable <br /> concentration of TBA and the groundwater samples from wells MW5 and MW8 contained <br /> detectable concentrations of TAME. Groundwater samples collected from wells MW2, MW3, <br /> and MW7 contained no detectable concentrations of MTBE, ETBE, DIPE, TAME, TBA, t,2- <br /> DCA, or EDB. Analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2. <br /> s:lenviromental125847100371reportsl4gr-2003.doe 3 ' <br />