Laserfiche WebLink
Project 113-26, Page 6 <br /> The rate of horizontal flow through the soil is calculated by multiplying the <br /> hydraulic conductivity of the soil by the groundwater gradient. The groundwater <br /> gradients found at the study property would cause a flow rate of 0.02 inches/year in <br /> a silty clay with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-8 m/s, a rate of 20 inches/year for a <br /> fine sand with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-5 m/s, and about 650 feet/year for a <br /> medium-grained sand with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-3 m/s. <br /> The rate of groundwater flow can vary greatly depending on arrangement of high <br /> and low conductivity layers Ancient rivers deposit channels of sandy or gravelly <br /> soil that serve as groundwater conduits compared to surrounding silts and clays. If a <br /> sand layer, such as the blue sand layer found below 6 feet in borehole 7, extended to <br /> the southeast, it could carry contamination a surprisingly great distance. However, <br /> the actual rates of groundwater movement can only be determined with pump tests <br /> in the field. <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services (Letter, February 24, 1993) was concerned <br /> about soil on the study property to the south and southeast of the former <br /> excavation, but not to the west and southwest. They have no information about the <br /> area to the north <br /> This work shows that the contamination plume does not extend to the area <br /> southeast and east of the former excavation. The extent of contamination to the <br /> north and to the southwest is still unknown. It is still unclear whether this <br /> contamination plume orginated on the study property or at the abandoned gas <br /> stations on the northwest and southwest corners of Grant Line Road and Holly. <br /> The Count also asked for tests for TPH-d and ethylene dibromide (February V, <br /> Y Y <br /> 1993). However this correspondence was not received on time by Parker <br /> Environmental Services to be included in this sample group. These tests will be <br /> made in the next round of quarterly monitoring. <br />' IV. Recommendations. <br /> After careful consideration and analysis of the data collected for this report, it is the <br /> opinion of Parker Environmental Services that The Customer Company should: <br />' 1 Continue quarterly monitoring, adding tests for EDB and TPH-d. <br /> 2. To further characterize the extent of contamination, either. <br /> A Supervise and dnll five boreholes along the west end of the <br /> property- <br /> B Install a monitoring well west of the tanks. <br /> A map showing locations of proposed boreholes and the proposed monitoring well <br /> is in the Appendix <br /> 24 <br /> Parker Environmental Services 4185 Rialto Court Pittsburg CA 94565-6116 <br />' Phone (510) 439-1024 Fax (510) 439-2566 <br />