Laserfiche WebLink
Mr.John Johnson <br /> Project Y]3-2k-02,December 16,1993 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Groundwater at Cheaperl Store #37 has demonstrated significant amounts of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons at MW-4 for the entire monitoring year. Detectable levels <br /> have also been found at MW-Y. The apparent source of the petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> is the former location of the underground gasoline tanks kiowevei:, an <br /> investigation described in an Apnl, 20, 1993, report by Parker Environmental <br /> Services indicated high TPI-i-g concentrations west (upgradient) of the former tank <br /> location. This could indicate an off-site source. <br /> It dries nota ear that the petroleum hydrocarbon levels in the groundwater are <br /> diminishing at significant ate. Hydrocarbons increase with higher groundwater <br /> levelb, and decrease with lower levels, indicating a continued presence of gasoline <br /> in the soils above the groundwater near MW-4. <br /> It is uncertain given the current well configuration if petroleum hydrocarbons are <br /> remaining on-site or moving off-site. As shown in the gasoline concentration <br /> figure, MW-4, downgradient from the former tank location, has the highest <br /> concentration of T?H-g The TPH-g concentration north of MW-4 can only be <br /> estimated with the exibting well placements. <br /> The Regional Water Quality ContrO Board and county regulatory will not allow <br /> closure for this site given the past year's sampling resultb. Closure is typically <br /> granted when one to two years of quarterly monitoring results are non-detect <br /> Two alternative .strategies for site closure are available for this site. First, you can <br /> remove the apparent source of the petroleum hydrocarbons, the soil around the <br /> former underground gasoline tank location. This would eliminate the apparent <br /> continued release of hydrocarbons to the groundwater. Regulatory agencieb would <br /> also require the existing hydrocarbons be removed from the groundwater to <br /> minimum levels, probably regwring additional wells and a pump-and-treat system <br /> Second, a groundwater treatment system with a percolation gallery to flush the <br /> contaminated sails can be installed to remove both soil and groundwater <br /> contamination. <br /> Parker Environmental Services recommends that two additional monitoring wells <br /> be installed, cine northeast of MW-4, and one west of the existing tanks near Holly <br /> ' Drive. Mis would help define any possible on-site or off-site petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon migration. <br /> 51 <br /> Parker Environmental Service&, 190 Fist 7th Street, PAUbarg, CA 94565-2317 <br /> ' rholie (510) 439-1024 Fox (510) 439-2566 <br />