Laserfiche WebLink
ME <br /> }ianitorin Well Uevelo ment set for a <br /> wel' gc.at had developed. <br /> .-� lggl after the monitu wen9 s were properly surging <br /> on June 28, ��o , the monitoring ur in each well. g, <br /> minimum of he by surging and p g g 1_1/2-inch outside <br /> The wells coed byveloped an extension of clearer the well water <br /> was performed by e into the well and displacing six well casing <br /> diameter PVC pipe A roximately well. The <br /> through the screened inter um�ed from each monitoring <br /> volumes of water were then Q P five gallons per <br /> using a series submersible electric pump• <br /> water' was pumped s at a rate of approximately five minutes <br /> Groundwater was pumped was pumped dry (approximately ly pro] <br /> erly <br /> minute until the well containerized on site in <br /> per weil) . Development water was The waker was disposal method. <br /> _gallon DOT 1� drums. Proper disp <br /> labelled 55-g pro <br /> per disposal of <br /> until analytical results indicates dehfo r the p <br /> Arrangements are currently being <br /> the development water. with <br /> ment was thoroughly steam-cleaned anossibility of <br /> Development equip order to reduce the p <br /> deionized <br /> water before re-use in wells. <br /> cross-contamination between monitoring <br /> ' <br /> Gro�undwater Sam .lin9 sed after the <br /> after a minimum of 72 hours had W21Ps MW-1► MW-2r <br /> on July 17, 1991, monitoring casing volumes in <br /> wells had been developed, um ed <br /> ,• monitoring ur ad of a minimum of four wellThe purged water wasp P <br /> and MW-3 were p g 1Tn roved drums, along with <br /> preparation for groundwater Sampling- <br /> g app <br /> } 55-gallon, open head, water, and stored on-site. <br /> into 55-g development <br /> previously recovered to groundwater was <br /> the depth resentr was <br /> Youndwater sampling. roductr if P <br /> Prior to g- floating P the field parameters <br /> measured, and the thickness of Of the wells, <br /> During the purging temperature were monitored. If <br /> determined. and temp ed water, a field <br /> H electrical conductivity,were nroted in the purged <br /> °f du odor or sheen parameters had been observed to <br /> product After the field P water was purged from each <br /> notation was made. prior <br /> stabilize and the minimum volume o <br /> the wells were allowed to recover to a minimum of 80� P <br /> well, groundwater sample$• <br /> to the collection of g g a transparent <br /> The first groundwater samples <br /> were collected t 'k presence <br /> bailer. gam les. The groundwater in the bailer <br /> b The clear bheler �nabled us to check for the <br /> PVG product in t lass VOA -)ottles and capped <br /> of floating P 40-m1, glass <br /> The remaining samples <br /> was then slowly poured into 2 and the <br /> s with teflon gee teflon bailers amber <br /> with plastic screw top disposable 1_liter <br /> were collected by using oured into 4 teflon <br /> were slowly P s with <br /> groundwater samples ed with plastic screw top vials W"' <br /> ling bottleA and capped <br /> sample, thQ bottles/ the <br /> same upon <br /> collecting bubbles were noted, <br /> _. septa. _...... . bubbles- <br /> inverted <br /> ubbles. If. <br /> 10 wan obtained. . <br /> aw hamp _...... <br /> invertewasndiscarded and a n... . <br /> sample PAGE 11 <br /> 275 GRANT LINE ROAD <br />