My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
4 (STATE ROUTE 4)
>
17750
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0501477
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:09:22 AM
Creation date
1/24/2020 2:15:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0501477
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0005116
FACILITY_NAME
SMS BRINERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
17750
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 4
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
18314010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17750 E HWY 4
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CENTRAL VALLE REGIONAL WATER QUALIT" CONTROL BOARD <br /> DOSP cnoN REPORT: <br /> 1 December 1989 <br /> DISCHARGER: SMS Briners, Inc. <br /> LOCATION 5 COUNTY: 10 miles east of Stockton at 17750 E. Highway 4, San Joaquin County <br /> CONTACT(S): Mr. Arnold Sousa, owner <br /> INSPECTION DATE: 17 October 1989 <br /> INSPECTED BY: Patricia Leary and David Brent Eli, <br /> c • ,;_ , � <br /> ACCOMPANIED BY: Arnold Sousa DEC 12 M.9 <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS: PER MIT/SERVICES <br /> SMS Briners is a vegetable brining facility currently regulated under Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements Order No. 79-42. <br /> On 17 October 1989 I made an inspection of the site with David Brent to familiarize <br /> myself with the operation and the ongoing groundwater investigation and to assess <br /> compliance with their Waste Discharge Requirements and current regulations. <br /> We first met with Mr. Sousa, to be briefed on the facility improvements recently <br /> undertaken and planned to prevent further discharge of wastes to surface and ground <br /> waters. He said that three additional monitoring wells were installed in September <br /> 1989. He also reported that they had changed half of their salt handling to bulk <br /> loading to prevent spillage. They plan to plumb all the fiberglass brining tanks <br /> together to prevent further tank drainage from flowing on their asphalt pad. SMS also <br /> has a sampling program in place to determine if storm runoff carries contaminants to <br /> surface water. <br /> After our meeting we toured the facility. We began in the fiberglass tank area. <br /> Asphalt was laid under all the tanks, reportedly to collect and route tank drainage <br /> and storm runoff to the evaporation ponds. The asphalt did not appear to extend out <br /> from the tanks sufficiently, nor have a large enough berm to contain any significant <br /> spillage. Mr. Sousa said he was hoping that, once the tanks were plumbed to transport <br /> brine wastes through piping, that the pads could be graded to drain directly into the <br /> North Fork of Littlejohns Creek. I told him that the pad, with adequate berms, should <br /> be used as secondary containment. Discharge to the creek might be allowed only if <br /> analyses results showed the flows to be uncontaminated from his operations. <br /> I noted that all the roadways between the tank rows were unpaved. On one road I <br /> observed an uncovered, approximately one ton bin filled with salt, and some salt <br /> spillage on the ground. Mr. Sousa said the bulk loading, once fully implemented, would <br /> replace all the open bin usage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.