Laserfiche WebLink
recurring flow patterns in the deep zone are much less apparent than in the shallow zone as <br /> groundwater flow is frequently controlled by pumping of on-site production wells and <br /> agricultural water supply wells in close proximity to the facility. Radial flow patterns <br /> centered about Well B, P4, and P5, with flow occuring in all directions, are common. Also, <br /> gradients (possibly induced by pumping of agricultural wells P6 and P7)have contributed to <br /> a component of flow in the southwest direction. <br /> North and northeast gradients have been observed more frequently in the last three to four <br /> ` years and have typically been on the order of 0.002 to 0.003 ft/ft under the footprint of the <br /> facility; gradients encountered to the southwest of the facility are frequently an order of <br /> magnitude smaller. <br /> 2.3 Aquifer Properties <br /> Two deep zone aquifer tests were conducted in 1985 prior to the construction of any <br /> monitoring wells in the shallow zone (LSCE, 1985). Production well P4 served as the <br /> pumped well for the first test, and results yielded an average transmissivity of 275,000 gpd/ft <br /> and a storativity of 1.4 x 10-3. P4 has six discrete screened intervals extending from a depth <br /> of 144 to 328 feet with a cumulative screen length of 60 feet. It is completed much deeper <br /> than any of the dedicated monitoring wells. Production well P5 served as the pumped well <br /> for the second test, and results yielded an average transmissivity of 149,000 gpd/ft. P5 was <br /> constructed with six discrete screened intervals extending from a depth of 212 to 373 feet <br /> with a cumulative screen length of 55 feet. Similar to P4, P5 was completed much deeper <br /> than any of the dedicated monitoring wells at the time of the aquifer test. A video log of P5 <br /> conducted in November 1989 (LSCE, 1990a)revealed severe encrustation of the well casing. <br /> Less encrustation was observed at the screen section extending from a depth of 212 to 222 <br /> feet. <br /> In April 1990, the lower portion of P5 was abandoned, and the total depth of the well was <br /> reduced to 277 feet(leaving only the uppermost three screened intervals). A second aquifer <br /> test was conducted in P5, and test results yielded transmissivity values ranging from 66,800 <br /> to 102,000 gpd/ft, a storativity of 1.9 x 10-4, and a leakance of 0.08 suggesting a semi- <br /> confined(or leaky confined) nature of the deep zone (LSCE, 1990b). Aquifer tests have not <br /> been conducted in the shallow zone, however, water level responses in shallow zone <br /> monitoring wells MWl and MW3A clearly documented the existence of a hydraulic <br /> connection between the shallow and deep zones. The shallow zone transmissivity was <br /> estimated to be about 2,200 gpd/ft via specific capacity data from MW3A collected during <br /> purging operations (LSCE, 1992). Transmissivity values estimated from specific capacity <br /> data derived from short term pumping events often are low, therefore, it is expected that the <br /> shallow zone transmissivity values are likely higher than 2,200 gpd/ft. <br /> © LUHDORFF & SCALMANINI <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3 <br />