Laserfiche WebLink
V %W� Project No, 034-00009 <br /> Page No. 2 <br /> September 9, 1989. Upon completion of the tank removal, two soil samples and one groundwater sample <br /> were collected directly below the tank at 15 feet below surface grade (bsg). Based on laboratory <br /> analytical results from the excavation samples, H&H determined that hydrocarbon contamination was <br /> present in soil at maximum concentrations of 330 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) gasoline, 16,000 <br /> micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg)total xylenes, and 3,000 pg/kg ethylbenzene. In addition, hydrocarbon <br /> contamination was present in groundwater at concentrations of 4.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L) gasoline, <br /> 33 micrograms per liter (µg/L) benzene, 200 }tg/L total xylenes, and 110 p.g/L ethylbenzene. <br /> Concentrations of kerosene, diesel, benzene, and toluene were not detected in the soil samples at or <br /> above the respective laboratory reporting limits. Concentrations of kerosene, diesel, and toluene were not <br /> detected in the groundwater sample at or above the respective laboratory reporting limits. <br /> In a workplan dated May 13, 1991 (Attachment 4), the installation of eight groundwater monitoring wells <br /> was proposed for a 62-arce parcel of property that included the subject. The placement of the wells was <br /> designed to investigate the area of the subject site's former UST along with potential hydrocarbon <br /> contamination not related to the subject site (The larger off-site investigation ultimately received closure <br /> from the SJCDEH). The workplan indicates that the SJCEHD was involved in approving the placement <br /> of these wells. According to the SJCEHD, a permit for the installation of these wells was approved and a <br /> permit was issued on May 21, 1991 (Permit#91-1193). <br /> According to a Report of Findings, dated July 22, 1991 (Attachment 5), Toxic Technology Inc. (TTI), <br /> installed one monitoring well (MW-1) in accordance with the May 13, 1991, workplan. The well was <br /> installed in May 1991 to a depth of 22 feet bsg in the immediate vicinity of the former UST. Soil <br /> samples were collected for laboratory analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons from the boring (B-1) for the <br /> well at approximately five-foot intervals (i.e., at 9, 14, and 18 feet bsg). A groundwater sample was <br /> collected from the well after its development and purging of approximately four volumes of groundwater. <br /> The samples were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons using EPA Methods 8015m and 8020. <br /> Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons that were tested for were not detected at or above the <br /> respective laboratory reporting limits in either the soil or groundwater samples. The sample collection <br /> protocol and well construction/development is detailed within the attached July 22, 1991, report. A <br /> detailed "soil layer description" and boring log for B-1/MW-1 and a table of groundwater analytical <br /> results is also included in the attached report. While several pages of laboratory-supplied analytical <br /> results and a chain-of-custody (COC) record are included in the July 22, 1991, report it appears that the <br /> copy of the report that provided to Krazan does not contain all the material that pertains to well MW-1. <br /> This may be due to pages becoming separated during many years of storage. <br /> KRAZAN&ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> Offices Serving the Western United States <br /> 3400009.1tr <br />