Laserfiche WebLink
Reuse of Excavated Soil GEOMATRIX <br /> Because this affected soil does not pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the <br /> environment, it can be re-used at the site. However, a petroleum hydrocarbon odor and <br /> crude/Bunker C oil residue may be present in this soil,therefore consideration should be given to <br /> Where the soil is placed. Potential reuse options include placement of the soil back into in the <br /> subsurface(e.g., in trenches and other excavations) or underneath surface coverings (e.g., roads, <br /> parking areas, or other paved structures). The following guidelines are recommended: (1) if <br /> used as trench backfill, do not place affected soil in contact with underground utilities; (2) do not <br /> place affected soil as backfill for excavations if geotechnical properties are insufficient; and (3) <br /> do not place shallower than 2 feet below ground surface unless covered by pavement. <br /> If affected soil cannot be reused in the subsurface or underneath surface coverings, the soil <br /> should be stockpiled separately from other non-affected soil excavated at the site and Chevron <br /> should be contacted(see contact list on last page). If affected soil is disposed of off site without <br /> r r Chevron's involvement, Chevron will not be responsible for any cost or liability associated with <br /> such disposal. In addition, it is important to consult with the disposal facility regarding potential <br /> restrictions for accepting petroleum hydrocarbon-affected soil. According to the San Joaquin <br /> Count Air Pollution Control District, no permit to stockpile this soil is required by them. <br /> Y <br /> Health and Safety Issues <br /> Because the affected soil does not pose a human health threat, construction workers or others <br /> 1 <br /> who encounter and handle affected soil do not require any unique health and safety training <br /> above standard requirements for performing their job. <br /> Proposition 65 Evaluation <br /> Based upon the results of the screening health risk assessment,the soil conditions at the <br /> Dividend property pose no significant risk as defined under Proposition 65, and are therefore not <br /> subject to this law. <br /> C2677\SOILPLAN.DOC 4 <br />