Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> t) <br /> �� lIfl1H1�X�[f HNfA <br /> Mr Bill Vizza <br /> 1 June 1994 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Soil samples were visually inspected for the presence of soil staining and screened for petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon vapor using an organic vapor analyzer equipped with a flame ionization detector <br /> Prior to beginning sampling activities, the organic vapor analyzer was calibrated using zero gas <br /> and methane gas standards Following standardization, a background reading for ambient air of <br /> 2 8 part per million was obtained <br /> Due to drilling refusal, three attempts were required before the desired soil sample could be <br /> collected (Refer to Figure 1) The initial soil boring location, B-1, was two feet east of the <br /> concrete slab constructed over the former tank location The second location, B-IA, was five feet <br /> east of the concrete slab and the third location, B-1 B, was ten feet east of the concrete slab <br /> Drilling location B-1 was refused at a depth of 8 feet below ground surface by broken concrete <br /> debris Unverified construction plans suggested that a concrete slab may have been present <br /> beneath the former tank However, such a slab was not noted to be present at the time of the tank <br /> removal The nature of the drilling refusal and visual inspection of the drilling bit following <br /> removal from the boring indicated that drilling was refused by broken concrete rubble and not a <br /> flat concrete surface Visual inspection of soil collected from the depth of refusal indicated the <br /> presence of broken concrete fragments not resultant from drilling Field screening of thus soil <br /> using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) equipped with a flame ionization detector revealed <br /> readings which were less than 5 ppm, less than 3 ppm over ambient aur, and not considered to be <br /> significantly elevated <br /> Following refusal at location B-1, drilling of B-1A was attempted at a location three feet further <br /> to the east of B-1 Drilling at location B-I A was again refused at a depth of eight feet below <br /> ground surface by broken concrete debris A third attempt, drilling of B-1 B, was made at a <br /> location five feet further east of location B-IA On the basis of information provided by the City <br /> of Tracy, it is believed that this location lies at the eastern end of the former underground storage <br /> tank Drilling at location B-IB was not refused by concrete debris and reached a depth of 10 feet <br /> below ground surface where a soil sample was collected <br /> RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES <br /> Groundwater Results <br /> Each groundwater sample submitted was analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br /> (TPH-D) using EPA Method 8015 modified and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes <br /> (BTEX) using EPA Method 8020 <br /> Laboratory results for April 1994 groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2 and verify the <br /> initial results indicating that petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene <br /> and total xylenes are not present in shallow groundwater at concentrations greater than their <br /> method detection limits <br />